BastianK wrote: Igor Sotelo wrote:
Basically this lenses are in the range of the Contax Zeiss 2/200 from 1992, which is probably better optically than the Canon 200mm 1.8L.
Why would you even think that?
I have absolutely zero reason to believe that.
Because they had 4 years to check Canon’s design, also with what Zeiss charged for their lenses, they could had access to better quality special glass. Zeiss also seems to have more know how than Canon in lenses.
Those are very "interesting" arguments.
I guess I will not waste my time further indulging into this discussion.
I said “probably”, not certainly. And I explained why is that probable.
Sep 05, 2022 at 08:37 AM
Previous versions of Igor Sotelo's message #16036695 « Contax Zeiss Aposonnar 2/200 questions »
