Previous versions of AmbientMike's message #16034019 « Is Viltrox Getting Sued? (No more RF-EF Adapters/Speedboosters/Lenses) »
AmbientMike Offline [X]
Re: Is Viltrox Getting Sued? (No more RF-EF Adapters/Speedboosters/Lenses)
jwolfe wrote:
None of that is true either. Tons of Canon shooters use Tamron and Sigma lenses. I see them out all the time. Dude stop being a fanboy for a minute and realize Canon biffed this one. Canon needs 3rd party lenses to fill out the ecosystem. A lot of people can’t afford Canon’s L lenses. The 100-500 is $2800! The Tamron 150-500 Sony is $1200! Sony and Nikon are much better off by offering photographers more options.
AmbientMike wrote:
3iron wrote:
Ambient Mike, Thanks, I did not realize Canon made an adaptor. So what is all the huff about, Isn't Canon just trying to protect their turf? Kinda crude about how they are doing it, but........ just gotta ask.
Basically canon has made a lot of advances people tend to ignore and instead lots of people have decided to complain about lack of 3rd party lenses that Canon isn't letting anyone make. In spite of the fact that hardly anyone on here has been using 3rd party in recent years. It doesn't make a lot of sense. Is this a permanent situation or is Canon trying to sell license in the near future to make lenses nobody knows. How much does Sony owning a lot of tamron have to do with it, who knows.
You told me I was completely wrong about previous major 3rd party issues, that pretty clearly happened. If you think I'm wrong go buy a 90's 3rd party lens. They're cheap they don't work right.
And yes this post is true, too. You not knowing what you are talking about doesn't make me wrong
Sep 01, 2022 at 09:39 PM
Previous versions of AmbientMike's message #16034019 « Is Viltrox Getting Sued? (No more RF-EF Adapters/Speedboosters/Lenses) »
