Re: Is Viltrox Getting Sued? (No more RF-EF Adapters/Speedboosters/Lenses)
AmbientMike wrote:
Another thing, Canon has TS-E 45/2.8, if you want 45mm prime. Also 3rd party 45/1.8 in EF that people seem to like.
I don't like computational imaging but canon has the 16mm rf.
You can disable the computational imaging in LR—most nature images don't need it. Coverage is about the same as my Samyang 14mm 2.8 with the profile disabled. If I crop out the vignette it's back to 14mm. I like it much more than the Samyang 14mm 2.8—and about 1/4 the size to boot.
Other the years I've owned dozens of lenses from Sigma, Tokina, Samyang and others on the Olympus, M series and EF mounts and my experiences were not good. I won't miss them on the RF mount. Plus, too many choices between EF and RF as it is. I just sold EF 15 (!) lenses to MPB and still have a cupboard full of lenses.
Sep 01, 2022 at 08:36 PM
Previous versions of Gochugogi's message #16033954 « Is Viltrox Getting Sued? (No more RF-EF Adapters/Speedboosters/Lenses) »
