Re: How does 50mm F2 Voigtlander APO lens compare?
Younjulius wrote:
It’s not surprising to see GM being better considering the price difference.
Well, you seem to be having some trouble in defining "better," particularly as in "better for me." (FWIW, it's the Voigtlander that is clearly better for me.)
For example, regarding your main use case of cityscapes, some people like well defined sunstars. The Sony has rounded aperture blades, so no sunstars. The Voigtlander behaves like this:
