Re: Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
Like many other people here I follow these threads regularly although don't often comment. I'm always interested to see what others are doing and how new equipment is performing in order to assist in making buying decisions. The above attacks are why I rarely comment The tailspin to childishness is sadly predictable. Anyone who thinks that eagle pic is "tack sharp" is either drunk, high, clueless, or has no idea what they are talking about. Buying new equipment is the first part of the equation. Too many people think it ends there. The personal attacks by the overly sensitive OP are uncalled for and juvenile. If you can't handle any form of criticism perhaps you shouldn't be posting your amateurish photos on a photography forum where they can be viewed by people who know what to look for in a decent image. You can either take something from that criticism or you can remain delusional and keep blaming your equipment. Here's a big crop taken by a "know nothing", "armchair quarterback", "hardhead" with a lowly third party superzoom for comparison sake. I would have liked to have posted a static shot in poor light on a terrible perch for a true comparison, but I deleted all those. And judging by your posting, face reality sir, you do need some lessons from somebody. Have a great day
Re: Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
Like many other people here I follow these threads regularly although don't often comment. I'm always interested to see what others are doing and how new equipment is performing in order to assist in making buying decisions. The above attacks are why I rarely comment The tailspin to childishness is sadly predictable. Anyone who thinks that eagle pic is "tack sharp" is either drunk, high, clueless, or has no idea what they are talking about. Buying new equipment is the first part of the equation. Too many people think it ends there. The personal attacks by the overly sensitive OP are uncalled for and juvenile. If you can't handle any form of criticism perhaps you shouldn't be posting your amateurish photos on a photography forum where they can be viewed by people who know what to look for in a decent image. You can either take something from that criticism or you can remain delusional and keep blaming your equipment. Here's a big crop taken by a "know nothing", "armchair quarterback", "hardhead" with a lowly third party superzoom for comparison sake. And judging by your posting, face reality sir, you do need some lessons from somebody. Have a great day
Jan 10, 2022 at 02:02 PM
Previous versions of sum1sgrampa's message #15824614 « Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread »
The tailspin to childishness is sadly predictable. Anyone who thinks that eagle pic is "tack sharp" is either drunk, high, clueless, or has no idea what they are talking about. Buying new equipment is the first part of the equation. Too many people think it ends there. The personal attacks by the overly sensitive OP are uncalled for and juvenile. If you can't handle any form of criticism perhaps you shouldn't be posting your amateurish photos on a photography forum where they can be viewed by people who know what to look for in a decent image. You can either take something from that criticism or you can remain delusional and keep blaming your equipment. Here's a big crop taken by a "know nothing", "armchair quarterback", "hardhead" with a lowly third party superzoom for comparison sake. I would have liked to have posted a static shot in poor light on a terrible perch for a true comparison, but I deleted all those. And judging by your posting, face reality sir, you do need some lessons from somebody. Have a great day