Oh look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the R3 to learn that 24mp is indeed "enough"... Yeah Right...
I will answer you with: look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the D3 15 years ago to learn that 12mp is also "enough"...
Top guys has made amazing work since the 4MP Canon 1D... But that's not a reason to say we never need more than 4MP...
I said in 2022, 24mp isn't enough because there is a 50MP A1 and a 45MP Z9 as competition for about the same price.. and soon to come 60MP(maybe) R1, 24MP will be amazing in 2018 before the A1 and Z9 are around. If Canon think 24MP is enough there won't be a R1 coming... I think the big 3 camera companies are more than fully educated on this professional camera topics.
You know what? Canon themselves can't get over the MP thing too, that's why R1 is coming...
BTW its never about what's enough, it's always about keep up with the competition, things will be perfectly fine if both Sony and Nikon flagship are sub 30MP but they are not...
jedibrain wrote:
One just needs to look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the R3 to learn that 24mp is indeed "enough", even for birds. Many of them have the R5 as well. The work is indistinguishable.
Some folks just can't get over the MP thing though. I suppose with so much of digital photography history being the MP wars, its just stuck in people's minds. Its their money of course, so they should spend it as they see fit. But spec sheet warriors saying things like 'in 2022, 24mp isn't enough' is a less than fully educated opinion stated as a fact. I'm not aiming that at anyone in particular, but there are lots of folks out there sharing that sentiment, while others are out there doing great work with their 1DXs etc. and not giving MP a second thought.
Price should always be cheaper! That's a separate argument. And things look really wonky with that Z9 out there. Hopefully Nikon trying to buy back some market share will work out for all of us with lower prices on new gear!
Oh look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the R3 to learn that 24mp is indeed "enough"... Yeah Right...
I will answer you with look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the D3 15 years ago to learn that 12mp is also "enough"...
Top guys has made amazing work since the 4MP Canon 1D... But that's not a reason to say we never need more than 4MP...
I said in 2022, 24mp isn't enough because there is a 50MP A1 and a 45MP Z9 as competition for about the same price.. and soon to come 60MP(maybe) R1, 24MP will be amazing in 2018 before the A1 and Z9 are around. If Canon think 24MP is enough there won't be a R1 coming... I think the big 3 camera companies are more than fully educated on this professional camera topics.
You know what? Canon themselves can't get over the MP thing too, that's why R1 is coming...
BTW its never about what's enough, it's always about keep up with the competition, things will be perfectly fine if both Sony and Nikon flagship are sub 30MP but they are not...
jedibrain wrote:
One just needs to look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the R3 to learn that 24mp is indeed "enough", even for birds. Many of them have the R5 as well. The work is indistinguishable.
Some folks just can't get over the MP thing though. I suppose with so much of digital photography history being the MP wars, its just stuck in people's minds. Its their money of course, so they should spend it as they see fit. But spec sheet warriors saying things like 'in 2022, 24mp isn't enough' is a less than fully educated opinion stated as a fact. I'm not aiming that at anyone in particular, but there are lots of folks out there sharing that sentiment, while others are out there doing great work with their 1DXs etc. and not giving MP a second thought.
Price should always be cheaper! That's a separate argument. And things look really wonky with that Z9 out there. Hopefully Nikon trying to buy back some market share will work out for all of us with lower prices on new gear!
Oh look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the R3 to learn that 24mp is indeed "enough"... Right...
I will answer you with look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the D3 15 years ago to learn that 12mp is also "enough"...
Top guys has made amazing work since the 4MP Canon 1D... But that's not a reason to say we never need more than 4MP...
I said in 2022, 24mp isn't enough because there is a 50MP A1 and a 45MP Z9 as competition for about the same price.. and soon to come 60MP(maybe) R1, 24MP will be amazing in 2018 before the A1 and Z9 are around. If Canon think 24MP is enough there won't be a R1 coming... I think the big 3 camera companies are more than fully educated on this professional camera topics.
You know what? Canon themselves can't get over the MP thing too, that's why R1 is coming...
BTW its never about what's enough, it's always about keep up with the competition, things will be perfectly fine if both Sony and Nikon flagship are sub 30MP but they are not...
jedibrain wrote:
One just needs to look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the R3 to learn that 24mp is indeed "enough", even for birds. Many of them have the R5 as well. The work is indistinguishable.
Some folks just can't get over the MP thing though. I suppose with so much of digital photography history being the MP wars, its just stuck in people's minds. Its their money of course, so they should spend it as they see fit. But spec sheet warriors saying things like 'in 2022, 24mp isn't enough' is a less than fully educated opinion stated as a fact. I'm not aiming that at anyone in particular, but there are lots of folks out there sharing that sentiment, while others are out there doing great work with their 1DXs etc. and not giving MP a second thought.
Price should always be cheaper! That's a separate argument. And things look really wonky with that Z9 out there. Hopefully Nikon trying to buy back some market share will work out for all of us with lower prices on new gear!
Oh look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the R3 to learn that 24mp is indeed "enough"... Right...
I will answer you with look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the D3 15 years ago to learn that 12mp is also "enough"...
Top guys has made amazing work since the 4MP Canon 1D... But that's not a reason to say we never need more than 4MP...
I said in 2022, 24mp isn't enough because there is a 50MP A1 and a 45MP Z9 as competition and soon to come 60MP(maybe) R1, if Canon think 24MP is enough there won't be a R1 coming... I think the big 3 camera companies are more than fully educated on this professional camera topics.
You know what? Canon themselves can't get over the MP thing too, that's why R1 is coming...
BTW its never about what's enough, it's always about keep up with the competition, things will be perfectly fine if both Sony and Nikon flagship are sub 30MP but they are not...
jedibrain wrote:
One just needs to look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the R3 to learn that 24mp is indeed "enough", even for birds. Many of them have the R5 as well. The work is indistinguishable.
Some folks just can't get over the MP thing though. I suppose with so much of digital photography history being the MP wars, its just stuck in people's minds. Its their money of course, so they should spend it as they see fit. But spec sheet warriors saying things like 'in 2022, 24mp isn't enough' is a less than fully educated opinion stated as a fact. I'm not aiming that at anyone in particular, but there are lots of folks out there sharing that sentiment, while others are out there doing great work with their 1DXs etc. and not giving MP a second thought.
Price should always be cheaper! That's a separate argument. And things look really wonky with that Z9 out there. Hopefully Nikon trying to buy back some market share will work out for all of us with lower prices on new gear!
Oh look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the R3 to learn that 24mp is indeed "enough"... Right...
I will answer you with look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the D3 15 years ago to learn that 12mp is also "enough"...
I think what made those amazing work is the top guys...
I said in 2022, 24mp isn't enough because there is a 50MP A1 and a 45MP Z9 as competition and soon to come 60MP(maybe) R1, if Canon think 24MP is enough there won't be a R1 coming... I think the big 3 camera companies are more than fully educated on this professional camera topics.
You know what? Canon themselves can't get over the MP thing too, that's why R1 is coming...
BTW its never about what's enough, it's always about keep up with the competition, things will be perfectly fine if both Sony and Nikon flagship are sub 30MP but they are not...
jedibrain wrote:
One just needs to look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the R3 to learn that 24mp is indeed "enough", even for birds. Many of them have the R5 as well. The work is indistinguishable.
Some folks just can't get over the MP thing though. I suppose with so much of digital photography history being the MP wars, its just stuck in people's minds. Its their money of course, so they should spend it as they see fit. But spec sheet warriors saying things like 'in 2022, 24mp isn't enough' is a less than fully educated opinion stated as a fact. I'm not aiming that at anyone in particular, but there are lots of folks out there sharing that sentiment, while others are out there doing great work with their 1DXs etc. and not giving MP a second thought.
Price should always be cheaper! That's a separate argument. And things look really wonky with that Z9 out there. Hopefully Nikon trying to buy back some market share will work out for all of us with lower prices on new gear!
Oh look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the R3 to learn that 24mp is indeed "enough"... Right...
I will answer you with look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the D3 15 years ago to learn that 12mp is also "enough"...
I think what made those amazing work is the top guys...
I said in 2022, 24mp isn't enough because there is a 50MP A1 and a 45MP Z9 as competition and soon to come 60MP(maybe) R1, if Canon think 24MP is enough there won't be a R1 coming... I think the big 3 camera companies are more than fully educated on this professional camera topics.
You know what? Canon themselves can't get over the MP thing too, that's why R1 is coming...
jedibrain wrote:
One just needs to look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the R3 to learn that 24mp is indeed "enough", even for birds. Many of them have the R5 as well. The work is indistinguishable.
Some folks just can't get over the MP thing though. I suppose with so much of digital photography history being the MP wars, its just stuck in people's minds. Its their money of course, so they should spend it as they see fit. But spec sheet warriors saying things like 'in 2022, 24mp isn't enough' is a less than fully educated opinion stated as a fact. I'm not aiming that at anyone in particular, but there are lots of folks out there sharing that sentiment, while others are out there doing great work with their 1DXs etc. and not giving MP a second thought.
Price should always be cheaper! That's a separate argument. And things look really wonky with that Z9 out there. Hopefully Nikon trying to buy back some market share will work out for all of us with lower prices on new gear!
Oh look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the R3 to learn that 24mp is indeed "enough"... Right...
I will answer you with look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the D3 10 years ago to learn that 12mp is also "enough"...
I think what made those amazing work is the top guys...
I said in 2022, 24mp isn't enough because there is a 50MP A1 and a 45MP Z9 as competition and soon to come 60MP(maybe) R1, if Canon think 24MP is enough there won't be a R1 coming... I think the big 3 camera companies are more than fully educated on this professional camera topics.
You know what? Canon themselves can't get over the MP thing too, that's why R1 is coming...
jedibrain wrote:
One just needs to look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the R3 to learn that 24mp is indeed "enough", even for birds. Many of them have the R5 as well. The work is indistinguishable.
Some folks just can't get over the MP thing though. I suppose with so much of digital photography history being the MP wars, its just stuck in people's minds. Its their money of course, so they should spend it as they see fit. But spec sheet warriors saying things like 'in 2022, 24mp isn't enough' is a less than fully educated opinion stated as a fact. I'm not aiming that at anyone in particular, but there are lots of folks out there sharing that sentiment, while others are out there doing great work with their 1DXs etc. and not giving MP a second thought.
Price should always be cheaper! That's a separate argument. And things look really wonky with that Z9 out there. Hopefully Nikon trying to buy back some market share will work out for all of us with lower prices on new gear!
I said in 2022, 24mp isn't enough because there is a 50MP A1 and a 45MP Z9 as competition and soon to come 60MP(maybe) R1, if Canon think 24MP is enough there won't be a R1 coming... I think the big 3 camera companies are more than fully educated on this professional camera topics.
You know what? Canon themselves can't get over the MP thing too, that's why R1 is coming...
jedibrain wrote:
One just needs to look at the amazing work that the top guys around here are putting out with the R3 to learn that 24mp is indeed "enough", even for birds. Many of them have the R5 as well. The work is indistinguishable.
Some folks just can't get over the MP thing though. I suppose with so much of digital photography history being the MP wars, its just stuck in people's minds. Its their money of course, so they should spend it as they see fit. But spec sheet warriors saying things like 'in 2022, 24mp isn't enough' is a less than fully educated opinion stated as a fact. I'm not aiming that at anyone in particular, but there are lots of folks out there sharing that sentiment, while others are out there doing great work with their 1DXs etc. and not giving MP a second thought.
Price should always be cheaper! That's a separate argument. And things look really wonky with that Z9 out there. Hopefully Nikon trying to buy back some market share will work out for all of us with lower prices on new gear!
Jan 10, 2022 at 10:56 AM
Previous versions of EdwardDye's message #15824311 « Canon R1 or R3 »
