"Nikon, the company that had been in third place behind Sony and Canon in the full-frame mirrorless market (and it wasn’t a close third place), has not only caught back up but has outright passed them technologically by a considerable margin. “
Interesting article. 100% based on the spec sheet, 0% based on hands on use. Seems like the worst type of click-bait out there. Even after reading the article I can't figure out what specs they are basing the "outright passed them by a considerable margin" on? Reads like 120FPS 11MP jpegs and video codecs?
And there are plenty out there from Sony that have no citations.
What did you think about my above comment? Did you like it?
"With the arrival of the Z9, the top position in the professional mirrorless world is now shared with Nikon.
This will become more apparent, as more pros become familar with the Z9.
Each brand has certain features that are better than the other.
And the competition benefits all photographers. "
Back to my book. Later.
Your comment is spot on. To be fully confirmed with proper back to back testing which to date I only see Fro having done and even then somewhat limited.
I'm not sure what "there are plenty out there from Sony with no citations" has to do with anything. Sites like PetaPixel are full of garbage articles about all brands.
Thanks.
Why do you say only Fro? Do you think that Fro is the only reviewer who does proper reviews? I am one who respects his *in-depth* testing too. I also believe that several in the repository are good reviews. Do not have time to dig through them now. Must get back to my work.
I considered deleting the PetPixel review but folks had already commented on it. I decided I did not like the "outright passed them by considerable margin." phrase. It is not true. Each brand has features better than the other and it benefits we, the photographers
Something just came across NR about 800 development.
"Nikon, the company that had been in third place behind Sony and Canon in the full-frame mirrorless market (and it wasn’t a close third place), has not only caught back up but has outright passed them technologically by a considerable margin. “
Interesting article. 100% based on the spec sheet, 0% based on hands on use. Seems like the worst type of click-bait out there. Even after reading the article I can't figure out what specs they are basing the "outright passed them by a considerable margin" on? Reads like 120FPS 11MP jpegs and video codecs?
And there are plenty out there from Sony that have no citations.
What did you think about my above comment? Did you like it?
"With the arrival of the Z9, the top position in the professional mirrorless world is now shared with Nikon.
This will become more apparent, as more pros become familar with the Z9.
Each brand has certain features that are better than the other.
And the competition benefits all photographers. "
Back to my book. Later.
Your comment is spot on. To be fully confirmed with proper back to back testing which to date I only see Fro having done and even then somewhat limited.
I'm not sure what "there are plenty out there from Sony with no citations" has to do with anything. Sites like PetaPixel are full of garbage articles about all brands.
Thanks.
Why do you say only Fro? Do you think that Fro is the only reviewer who does proper reviews? I am one who likes his in-depth testing too. I also believe that several in the repository are good reviews. Do not have time to dig through them now. Must get back to my work.
I considered deleting the PetPixel review but folks had already commented on it. I decided I did not like the "outright passed them by considerable margin." phrase. It is not true. Each brand has features better than the other and it benefits we, the photographers
Something just came across NR about 800 development.
Later
Dec 13, 2021 at 07:37 PM
Previous versions of bs kite's message #15796173 « Z9: Countdown to air shipment and release....... »
