Re: Official: Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD (Model A058)
Alright, just a quick (obvious) non–scientific “test“ (rather playing around ) actually for myself. Wanted to have a focal length.around 65-70mm (if possible) with different lenses and find out how bokeh balls look like. Had the 35-150 at 85 by mistake. So not fully comparable, also since I moved etc. Since I do casual portraits, bokeh balls aren't important to me. Nevertheless I'm curious Anyway, if it's interesting for you, so be it. Obviously it depends a lot on the closest focusing distance and also on the focal length.
Sigma 65mm 2.0 (Prime) => fun fact: Capture One classifies it as "Voigtländer 65mm F/2 Macro "
Tamron 35-150 2.8 @ 86mm (Zoom)
Zeiss Planar 50 1.4 (Prime)
Sigma 105 1.4 (Prime)
Batis 40 2.0 (Prime)
Tamron 70-180 2.8 @ 70 (Zoom)
Oct 28, 2021 at 01:20 PM
Previous versions of zeitlos's message #15749948 « Official: Tamron 35-150mm F/2-2.8 Di III VXD (Model A058) »
) actually for myself. Wanted to have a focal length.around 65-70mm (if possible) with different lenses and find out how bokeh balls look like. Had the 35-150 at 85 by mistake. So not fully comparable, also since I moved etc. Since I do casual portraits, bokeh balls aren't important to me. Nevertheless I'm curious 
