Photographers are free to buy whatever product they wish. My issue is misinformation with those posing as industry experts, and then go to great effort to exhibit varying levels of failure; but it is has come to pass that species of influencer qualifies as a credible source.
NR is different, because its name speaks loudly
Posting questionable sources to justify a whim has a record of eliciting condemnation. Attempts to cite this channel here previously generate noise and another brand war.
It seems like the maturation of Nikon's Z system unsettles many, including sufferers of Relevance Depravation Syndrome, which can only explain their desperate attempts to get attention with youtube https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1662703/0#15339362
Time and again, it has to be pointed out there are very few reliable sources on the internet wrt photographic products. The reason why Steve Perry has credibility resides in his images and educational products.
And as with Thom Hogan he compares cameras across systems to expend the scope of educational clientele. Above the reviews by these two gentlemen take not just weeks but months to complete.
Thom Hogan has the same credentials: testified in his very detailed 3rd party camera manuals (ebooks).
Oct 27, 2021 at 03:03 AM
Previous versions of chambeshi's message #15748126 « New Z9 Specs (NR) Aug 10th, 2021 »
