Holger wrote: Immortal wrote: arbitrage wrote: grahamgibson wrote: arbitrage wrote:
Watch it quick...won't be up long....
&feature=emb_imp_woyt
Down already, hah. Anything interesting beyond the specs we already know?
Not really. Just confirmed a couple of those last minute specs that SAR posted before this video like reprogramable EC dial, REC button location and one SD, one SD/CFeA (instead of dual SD/CFeA like A1/A7SIII).
Confirmed only 10FPS. Shutter sounded way quieter than A7III when they compared them for portraits back to back.
Has Bird Eye AF which Tony says worked great (which is ironic as he complained about how "poor" the A1 was).
AF much improved over A7III.
For some reason I can still watch the video on my phone as I haven't reloaded the YT app so I guess it is in memory somehow??
Cache. It will work if you don't refresh.
IBIS is worse than the one in A7 III and IQ is pretty much the same (better colors on IV thou).
And you take all that for gospel? Hardly any real tests, and people are already complaining? Comparing to a 20 MP R6?
A 1.17 time higher linear resolution won't make a night and day difference, but still gives you more pixels if you need them.
Has there been a DR and S/N measurement already? Nevertheless, the A73 still has one of the best sensors on the market (https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Canon%20EOS%20R6,Nikon%20Z%206,Nikon%20Z%206II,Nikon%20Z%207II,Sony%20ILCE-7M3).
Including all the new PDAF points, going to 33 MP, a similar performance would be fantastic.
Why do people not think first?
Firstly stop with the insulting tone and sentances like "Why do people not think first" it makes you look like an... This is a friendly community and it's always good to remember that. There are no better nor worse here.
Second - i'm not complaining. It's an opinion and it's not even that at this point in time. It's simply few thoughts IF what he said (Northrup) is true.
Also different people, have different expectations. Nothing wrong with that. Like already several people said here - IF - what Northrup said is true then for ME/US - this camera could've been named A73 II - coz imo it's a bit underwhelming for the price imo.
Holger wrote: Immortal wrote: arbitrage wrote: grahamgibson wrote: arbitrage wrote:
Watch it quick...won't be up long....
&feature=emb_imp_woyt
Down already, hah. Anything interesting beyond the specs we already know?
Not really. Just confirmed a couple of those last minute specs that SAR posted before this video like reprogramable EC dial, REC button location and one SD, one SD/CFeA (instead of dual SD/CFeA like A1/A7SIII).
Confirmed only 10FPS. Shutter sounded way quieter than A7III when they compared them for portraits back to back.
Has Bird Eye AF which Tony says worked great (which is ironic as he complained about how "poor" the A1 was).
AF much improved over A7III.
For some reason I can still watch the video on my phone as I haven't reloaded the YT app so I guess it is in memory somehow??
Cache. It will work if you don't refresh.
IBIS is worse than the one in A7 III and IQ is pretty much the same (better colors on IV thou).
And you take all that for gospel? Hardly any real tests, and people are already complaining? Comparing to a 20 MP R6?
A 1.17 time higher linear resolution won't make a night and day difference, but still gives you more pixels if you need them.
Has there been a DR and S/N measurement already? Nevertheless, the A73 still has one of the best sensors on the market (https://www.photonstophotos.net/Charts/PDR.htm#Canon%20EOS%20R6,Nikon%20Z%206,Nikon%20Z%206II,Nikon%20Z%207II,Sony%20ILCE-7M3).
Including all the new PDAF points, going to 33 MP, a similar performance would be fantastic.
Why do people not think first?
Firstly stop with the insulting tone and sentances like "Why do people not think first" it makes you look like an... This is a friendly community and it's always good to remember that. There are no better nor worse here.
Second - i'm not complaining. It's an opinion and it's now even that and this point in time. It's simply few thoughts IF what he said (Northrup) is true.
Also different people, have different expectations. Nothing wrong with that. Like already several people said here - IF - what Northrup said is true then for ME/US - this camera could've been named A73 II - coz imo it's a bit underwhelming for the price imo.
You're free to disagree, like anybody.
Oct 20, 2021 at 03:41 PM
Previous versions of Immortal's message #15741142 « Pre-order: Sony Alpha a7 IV Mirrorless »
