leighton w wrote: rafaelcasd wrote: raboof wrote:
The 300mm f4.5 ED non-IF
Very little CA when zoomed in(second image). I had it at f5.6
OK. all this conversation had me add $80 to my initial offer and that was enough to get this. Hope is good as the seller takes no returns. But he states enough I can hold his feet to the fire in E-Bay if need be.
I should sue you all for encouraging addiction. That way I can enough money for the nocturnal and the 300mm 2.0.!!!!!!!
