saaketham wrote:
Here is an example of 3D pop someone posted on the Nikon forum recently. It was with a Nikon 28mm f/1.4.
For a start, there's mild "nisen" (double-line) bokeh in the background, which will tend to make whatever is in the foreground (in this case, the dogs) stand out. This is generally regarded as a lens defect, but here the photographer has turned it to their advantage.
I love that look .. the dog in front seems to pop out of the screen .. to my eyes
There may be some edge-enhancement (video terminology) or smart-sharpening (stills/Adobe terminology) going on. That might have been a choice of the photographer, or simply acceptance of defaults in post-processing software. I went to some effort to dial that down in my own workflow. I personally can't stand the effect.
Right now, if you want an excellent fast 35mm lens the EF 35mm f/1.4 L II is probably about the best available. I don't have it, because I usually prefer zooms and I have the Mk I. I actually use my Sony R1 with its Zeiss 35mm f//2 more than my Mk I, for its portability (not its Zeissiness).
saaketham wrote:
Here is an example of 3D pop someone posted on the Nikon forum recently. It was with a Nikon 28mm f/1.4.
For a start, there's mild "nisen" (double-line) bokeh in the background, which will tend to make whatever is in the foreground (in this case, the dogs) stand out. This is generally regarded as a lens defect, but here the photographer has turned it to their advantage.
I love that look .. the dog in front seems to pop out of the screen .. to my eyes
There may be some edge-enhancement (video terminology) or smart-sharpening (stills/Adobe terminology) going on. That might have been a choice of the photographer, or simply acceptance of defaults in post-processing software. I went to some effort to dial that down in my own workflow. I personally can't stand the effect.
Right now, if you want an excellent fast 35mm lens the EF 35mm f/1.4 L II is probably about the best available. I don't have it, because I usually prefer zooms and I have the Mk I. I actually use my Sony R1 with its Zeiss 25mm f//2 more than my Mk I, for its portability (not its Zeissiness).
Sep 24, 2021 at 05:25 AM
Previous versions of melcat's message #15717026 « I've been Zeissed... »
