gheller wrote:
Have to agree on the double catchlights as a distraction (even though it is intentional). Looks odd and may not be favorable if this is submitted for work (my brother is an acting coach in Hollywood and lets me know about these kinds of things).
Also, her being *so* off center to the left seems awkward.
I am usually a big fan, but this misses on a few points for me.
Regards
g
I appreciate you taking the time to give your input. The double catchlight is intentional and it is what I prefer in my portrait work, as with the majority of my work in which I use this lighting technique to achieve the same result. It is very intentional and I don't like the look of my portraits without it.
gheller wrote:
Have to agree on the double catchlights as a distraction (even though it is intentional). Looks odd and may not be favorable if this is submitted for work (my brother is an acting coach in Hollywood and lets me know about these kinds of things).
Also, her being *so* off center to the left seems awkward.
I am usually a big fan, but this misses on a few points for me.
Regards
g
I appreciate you taking the time to give your input. As I already said, the double catchlight is intentional and it is what I prefer in my portrait work, as with the majority of my work in which I use this lighting technique to achieve the same result. It is very intentional and I don't like the look of my portraits without it.
gheller wrote:
Have to agree on the double catchlights as a distraction (even though it is intentional). Looks odd and may not be favorable if this is submitted for work (my brother is an acting coach in Hollywood and lets me know about these kinds of things).
Also, her being *so* off center to the left seems awkward.
I am usually a big fan, but this misses on a few points for me.
Regards
g
Thanks for taking the time to comment. As I already said, the double catchlight is intentional and it is preferred, as with the majority of my work in which I use this lighting technique to achieve the same result. It is very intentional and I don't like the look of my portraits without it.
gheller wrote:
Have to agree on the double catchlights as a distraction (even though it is intentional). Looks odd and may not be favorable if this is submitted for work (my brother is an acting coach in Hollywood and lets me know about these kinds of things).
Also, her being *so* off center to the left seems awkward.
I am usually a big fan, but this misses on a few points for me.
Regards
g
Thanks for taking the time to comment. As I already said, the double catchlight is intentional and it is preferred, as with the majority of my work in which I use this lighting technique to achieve the same result. It is very intentional.
gheller wrote:
Have to agree on the double catchlights as a distraction (even though it is intentional). Looks odd and may not be favorable if this is submitted for work (my brother is an acting coach in Hollywood and lets me know about these kinds of things).
Also, her being *so* off center to the left seems awkward.
I am usually a big fan, but this misses on a few points for me.
Regards
g
Thanks for taking the time to comment. As I already said, the double catchlight is intentional and it is preferred, as with the majority of my work in which I use this lighting technique to achieve the same result.
Jul 25, 2021 at 11:05 AM
Previous versions of DanielScott's message #15660598 « Mycah - Portrait of an actress »