Re: "Official" Nikon 105 f/2.8S Micro Discussion and Image Thread
suteetat wrote:
Bokeh seems smoother and not quite so busy like 105/2.8 AF-S VR.
The bokeh of my 105/2.8 AF-S VR has never been busy.
Could you please provide examples demonstrating that 105 MC bokeh is not "so busy" as 105/2.8 AF-S VR'?
Probably you had a faulty sample.
Thanx.
Re: "Official" Nikon 105 f/2.8S Micro Discussion and Image Thread
suteetat wrote:
Bokeh seems smoother and not quite so busy like 105/2.8 AF-S VR.
The bokeh of my 105/2.8 AF-S VR has never been busy.
Could you please provide examples demonstrating that 105 MC bokeh is not "so busy" as 105/2.8 AF-S VR'?
Probably you had a faulty sample.
Thanx.
Re: "Official" Nikon 105 f/2.8S Micro Discussion and Image Thread
suteetat wrote:
Bokeh seems smoother and not quite so busy like 105/2.8 AF-S VR.
The bokeh of my 105/2.8 AF-S VR has never been busy.
Could you please provide examples demonstrating that 105 MC bokeh is not "so busy" as 105/2.8 AF-S VR'?
Probably you had a faulty sample.
Thanx.
Re: "Official" Nikon 105 f/2.8S Micro Discussion and Image Thread
suteetat wrote:
Bokeh seems smoother and not quite so busy like 105/2.8 AF-S VR.
The bokeh of my 105/2.8 AF-S VR has never been busy.
Could you please provide examples demonstrating that 105 MC bokeh is not "so busy" as 105/2.8 AF-S VR'?
Probably you had a faulty sample.
Thanx.
D700 w/AF-S 105/2.8 ED VR @ f/4
Z6 w/AF-S 105/2.8 ED VR @ f/14
Jul 09, 2021 at 07:45 AM
Previous versions of Ripolini's message #15645352 « "Official" Nikon 105 f/2.8S Micro Discussion and Image Thread »
