Re: "Official" Nikon 105 f/2.8S Micro Discussion and Image Thread
Lance B wrote:
... from wide open it is idiotically sharp and has great bokeh.
At distances where the widest aperture is f/3, the same holds for AF-S 105/2.8 VR, although my Zeiss 100/2 Makro-Planar is better
I have pictures taken with 105 VR and TC-14 E II which are impressively sharp. The 105 Z MC doesn't work with TCs, unfortunately.
P.S.: a comparison between 105 MC and similar lenses that AF on Z cameras would be helpful.
D700 w/AF-S 105/2.8 ED VR & TC 14 E II, f/8, 1/320 s, 1600 ISO
Re: "Official" Nikon 105 f/2.8S Micro Discussion and Image Thread
Lance B wrote:
... from wide open it is idiotically sharp and has great bokeh.
At distances where the widest aperture is f/3, the same holds for AF-S 105/2.8 VR, although my Zeiss 100/2 Makro-Planar is better
I have pictures taken with 105 VR and TC-14 E II which are impressively sharp. The 105 Z MC doesn't work with TCs, unfortunately.
P.S.: a comparison between 105 MC and similar lenses that AF on Z cameras would be helpful.
D700 w/AF-S 105/2.8 ED VR & TC 14 E II, f/8, 1/320 s, 1600 ISO
Re: "Official" Nikon 105 f/2.8S Micro Discussion and Image Thread
Lance B wrote:
... from wide open it is idiotically sharp and has great bokeh.
At distances where the widest aperture is f/3, the same holds for AF-S 105/2.8 VR, although my Zeiss 100/2 Makro-Planar is better
I have pictures taken with 105 VR and TC-14 E II which are impressively sharp. The 105 Z MC doesn't work with TCs, unfortunately.
P.S.: a comparison between 105 MC and similar lenses that AF on Z cameras would be helpful.
D700 w/AF-S 105/2.8 ED VR & TC 14 E II, f/8, 1/320 s, 1600 ISO
Re: "Official" Nikon 105 f/2.8S Micro Discussion and Image Thread
Lance B wrote:
... from wide open it is idiotically sharp and has great bokeh.
At distances where the widest aperture is f/3, the same holds for AF-S 105/2.8 VR, although my Zeiss 100/2 Makro-Planar is better
I have pictures taken with 105 VR and TC-14 E II which are impressively sharp. The 105 Z MC doesn't work with TCs, unfortunately.
P.S.: a comparison between 105 MC and similar lenses that AF on Z cameras would be helpful.
Re: "Official" Nikon 105 f/2.8S Micro Discussion and Image Thread
Lance B wrote:
... from wide open it is idiotically sharp and has great bokeh.
At distances where the widest aperture is f/3, the same holds for AF-S 105/2.8 VR, although my Zeiss 100/2 Makro-Planar is better
I have pictures taken with 105 VR and TC-14 E II which are impressively sharp. The 105 Z MC doesn't work with TCs, unfortunately.
P.S.: a comparison between 105 MC and similar lenses that AF on Z cameras would be helpful.
Re: "Official" Nikon 105 f/2.8S Micro Discussion and Image Thread
Lance B wrote:
... from wide open it is idiotically sharp and has great bokeh.
At distances where the widest aperture is f/3, the same holds for AF-S 105/2.8 VR, although my Zeiss 100/2 Makro-Planar is better
I have pictures taken with 105 VR and TC-14 E II which are impressively sharp. The 105 Z MC doesn't work with TCs, unfortunately.
P.S.: a comparison between 105 MC and similar lenses that AF on Z cameras would be helpful.
Re: "Official" Nikon 105 f/2.8S Micro Discussion and Image Thread
Lance B wrote:
... from wide open it is idiotically sharp and has great bokeh.
At distances where the widest aperture is f/3, the same holds for AF-S 105/2.8 VR, although my Zeiss 100/2 Makro-Planar is better
I have pictures taken with 105 VR and TC-14 E II which are impressively sharp. The 105 Z MC doesn't work with TCs, unfortunately.
P.S.: a comparison between 105 MC and similar lenses that AF on Z cameras would be helpful.
D700 w/AF-S 105/2.8 ED VR & TC 14 E II
Jun 25, 2021 at 08:23 AM
Previous versions of Ripolini's message #15632718 « "Official" Nikon 105 f/2.8S Micro Discussion and Image Thread »
