If one mostly photographs landscapes and streets, and just want the AF for some people photographs once in a while, the f/2 lenses make more sense over the f/1.4 lenses. But it's tough giving up f/1.4, as they can be had for just a few hundred bucks more (at least the Sigma options, which already are outstanding wide open on the a7R IV). I currenly own the 85 DN and was sure that I was going to pair it with an upcoming 35 f/1.4 DN. But I'm not so sure if it's worth the bulk and size when I rarely need f/1.4, just as many here don't. Then there are the CV lenses that compliment the landscape kit and are overall just pleasing to use due to mechanical perfection and experience, rendition and image quality, but they make it harder to justify the f/2 DNs and vice versa. But at this point, it's also hard to justify lenses like the 35 and 65 APOs if one also owns the 35 and 65 f/2 DNs, which are very close at landscape apertures. On the extremes, I would go for 12/14-24 and 100-400 zooms. It makes up a bit of an odd landscapes/city scapes kit with 2 big DN/GM zooms (12/14-24 and 100-400), 1 CV (35 APO) and 1 DN (65 DN). I will just turn the DN in to MF and call it a day. The 35 APO will be an exception, whereas the 65 APO can go for the DN.
If one mostly photographs landscapes and streets, and just want the AF for some people photographs once in a while, the f/2 lenses make more sense over the f/1.4 lenses. But it's tough giving up f/1.4, as they can be had for just a few hundred bucks more (at least the Sigma options, which already are outstanding wide open on the a7R IV). I currenly own the 85 DN and was sure that I was going to pair it with an upcoming 35 f/1.4 DN. But I'm not so sure if it's worth the bulk and size when I rarely need f/1.4, just as many here don't. Then there are the CV lenses that compliment the landscape kit and are overall just pleasing to use due to mechanical perfection and experience, rendition and image quality, but they make it harder to justify the f/2 DNs and vice versa. But at this point, it's also hard to justify lenses like the 35 and 65 APOs if one also owns the 35 and 65 f/2 DNs, which are very close at landscape apertures. On the extremes, I would go for 12/14-24 and 100-400 zooms. It makes up a bit of an odd landscapes kit with 2 big DN/GM zooms (12/14-24 and 100-400), 1 CV (35 APO) and 1 DN (65 DN). I will just turn the DN in to MF and call it a day. The 35 APO will be an exception, whereas the 65 APO can go for the DN.
