fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of Susurus's message #15569131 « Testing UV filters in order to reduce (Lo)CA (Zeiss 55mm 1.8 & R4) »

  

Susurus
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Testing UV filters in order to reduce (Lo)CA (Zeiss 55mm 1.8 & R4)


Hi!

I have posted a thread earlier wondering whether UV filter could help reducing LoCA on lenses, and decided to do some testing.

I have obtained 6 different (supposedly strong UV - within 400-420nm range) filters to test on my Zeiss 55mm 1.8 and R4:

1) B+W 415 (filter arrived but I realised it is fake) - there is no effect with this filter on the image as well;

2) Older Panchromar UV II - the filter has arrived and initial results seem to be positive;

3) B+W 415 Strong UV (original) / Should be Schott GG400 glass (Reply added on 10/05/2021);

4) Tiffen 2B (Tests added on 30/04/2021);

5) Custom Schott (GG420 glass) @ 2mm and around 418nm (Not here yet);

6) GTX L41 filter (Tests added on 12/05/2021).

Below are 2 filters which have arraived and test samples for Panchromar. ...Unfortunately, it seems I cannot upload files here, so I will try to link another forum.

P.S. Panchromar provides good initial results, just WB is something you have to adjust probably. However, I generally initially like slightly warmer / yellower WB on this lens.





May 12, 2021 at 08:13 AM
Susurus
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Testing UV filters in order to reduce (Lo)CA (Zeiss 55mm 1.8 & R4)


Hi!

I have posted a thread earlier wondering whether UV filter could help reducing LoCA on lenses, and decided to do some testing.

I have obtained 6 different (supposedly strong UV - within 400-420nm range) filters to test on my Zeiss 55mm 1.8 and R4:

1) B+W 415 (filter arrived but I realised it is fake) - there is no effect with this filter on the image as well;

2) Older Panchromar UV II - the filter has arrived and initial results seem to be positive;

3) B+W 415 Strong UV (original) / Should be Schott GG400 glass (Reply added on 10/05/2021);

4) Tiffen 2B (Tests added on 30/04/2021);

5) Custom Schott (GG420 glass) @ 2mm and around 418nm (Not here yet);

6) GTX L41 filter.

Below are 2 filters which have arraived and test samples for Panchromar. ...Unfortunately, it seems I cannot upload files here, so I will try to link another forum.

P.S. Panchromar provides good initial results, just WB is something you have to adjust probably. However, I generally initially like slightly warmer / yellower WB on this lens.





May 10, 2021 at 09:30 AM
Susurus
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Testing UV filters in order to reduce (Lo)CA (Zeiss 55mm 1.8 & R4)


Hi!

I have posted a thread earlier wondering whether UV filter could help reducing LoCA on lenses, and decided to do some testing.

I have obtained 5 different (supposedly strong UV - within 400-420nm range) filters to test on my Zeiss 55mm 1.8 and R4:

1) B+W 415 (filter arrived but I realised it is fake) - there is no effect with this filter on the image as well;

2) Older Panchromar UV II - the filter has arrived and initial results seem to be positive;

3) B+W 415 Strong UV (original) / Should be Schott GG400 glass (not here yet);

4) Tiffen 2B (Tests added on 30/04/2021);

5) Custom Schott (GG420 glass) @ 2mm and around 418nm (Not here yet).


Below are 2 filters which have arraived and test samples for Panchromar. ...Unfortunately, it seems I cannot upload files here, so I will try to link another forum.

P.S. Panchromar provides good initial results, just WB is something you have to adjust probably. However, I generally initially like slightly warmer / yellower WB on this lens.





Apr 30, 2021 at 09:18 AM
Susurus
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Testing UV filters in order to reduce (Lo)CA (Zeiss 55mm 1.8 & R4)


Hi!

I have posted a thread earlier wondering whether UV filter could help reducing LoCA on lenses, and decided to do some testing.

I have obtained 5 different (supposedly strong UV - within 400-420nm range) filters to test on my Zeiss 55mm 1.8 and R4:

1) B+W 415 (filter arrived but I realised it is fake) - there is no effect with this filter on the image as well;

2) Older Panchromar UV II - the filter has arrived and initial results seem to be positive;

3) B+W 415 Strong UV (original) / Should be Schott GG400 glass (not here yet);

4) Tiffen 2B (Not here yet);

5) Custom Schott (GG420 glass) @ 2mm and around 418nm (Not here yet).


Below are 2 filters which have arraived and test samples for Panchromar. ...Unfortunately, it seems I cannot upload files here, so I will try to link another forum.

P.S. Panchromar provides good initial results, just WB is something you have to adjust probably. However, I generally initially like slightly warmer / yellower WB on this lens.





Apr 17, 2021 at 07:20 AM





  Previous versions of Susurus's message #15569131 « Testing UV filters in order to reduce (Lo)CA (Zeiss 55mm 1.8 & R4) »