There is something wrong with the picture. On the facial 100% magnification, the Canon showed the eye, eye brown, most of the nose, lip, chin and forehead are all in focus. On the Nikon, I don't see anything that is in critical focus at all. Kind of strange. I don't have Z6 though but shooting with Z7 ii and 100% magnification of facial shots on my 50/1.2s + Z7 ii looked a lot sharper.
Either the Nikon is not in perfect focus, shakiness or something is seriously wrong with the lens, I think. On the last sitting down pictures, even the shoes on Canon looked to be more in focus.
On photographyblog picture of the old man wiht Z7 ii, you can see the eye, the detail of eye brow, forehead wrinkle much better. I doubt it is the difference is dued to 24 vs 46mp only.
When I compared it to my friend's R5+50/1.2 RF, center sharpness is not that different. If anything, R5 has a AA filter which could make the picture slightly softer.
There is something wrong with the picture. On the facial 100% magnification, the Canon showed the eye, eye brown, most of the nose, lip, chin and forehead are all in focus. On the Nikon, I don't see anything that is in critical focus at all. Kind of strange. I don't have Z6 though but shooting with Z7 ii and 100% magnification of facial shots on my 50/1.2s + Z7 ii looked a lot sharper.
Either the Nikon is not in perfect focus, shakiness or something is seriously wrong with the lens, I think.
On photographyblog picture of the old man wiht Z7 ii, you can see the eye, the detail of eye brow, forehead wrinkle much better. I doubt it is the difference is dued to 24 vs 46mp only.
When I compared it to my friend's R5+50/1.2 RF, center sharpness is not that different. If anything, R5 has a AA filter which could make the picture slightly softer.
Mar 31, 2021 at 06:08 PM
Previous versions of suteetat's message #15551158 « Nikon Z 50/1.2s Images thread »
