Re: In Stock: Sigma 105mm f/2.8 DG DN Macro Art ($799)
This is a focus stack hence, a processed image. I didn't plan the focus stacking in advance and didn't have my tripod with me. It was done handheld. The plant was about the size of the little finger.
I used to have the Sony 90mm macro. For macro, I almost exclusively do MF. So AF comparison is irrelevant to me. Of course, you don't want to use either one for action shots (AF tracking), lol. The Sigma has longer working distance if that matters to you. For me, this is one of the reason to want to use the Sigma. So I am staying with with it for now.
Re: In Stock: Sigma 105mm f/2.8 DG DN Macro Art ($799)
This is a focus stack hence, a processed image. I didn't plan the focus stacking in advance and didn't have my tripod with me. So, it was done handheld. The plant was about the size of the little finger.
I used to have the Sony 90mm macro. For macro, I almost exclusively do MF. So AF comparison is irrelevant to me. Of course, you don't want to use either one for action shots (AF tracking), lol. The Sigma has longer working distance if that matters to you. For me, this is one of the reason to want to use the Sigma. So I am staying with with it for now.
Re: In Stock: Sigma 105mm f/2.8 DG DN Macro Art ($799)
This is a focus stack hence, a processed image. I didn't plan the focus stacking in advance and didn't have my tripod with me. So, it was done handheld. The plant was about the size of the little finger.
I used to have the Sony 90mm macro. For macro, I almost exclusively do MF. So AF comparison is irrelevant to me. Of course, you don't want to use either one for action shots (AF tracking), lol. The Sigma has longer working distance if that matters to you.
Re: In Stock: Sigma 105mm f/2.8 DG DN Macro Art ($799)
This is a focus stack hence, a processed image. I didn't plan the focus stacking in advance and didn't have my tripod with me. So, it was done handheld. The plant was about the size of the little finger.
I used to have the Sony 90mm macro. For macro, I almost exclusively do MF. So AF comparison is irrelevant to me for macro. For non-macro shots, both could be good enough for me for auto-focus. Of course, you don't want to use either one for action shots, lol. The Sigma has longer working distance if that matters to you.
I am staying with the Sigma for now.
Jan 09, 2021 at 08:36 PM
Previous versions of raminolta's message #15460274 « In Stock: Sigma 105mm f/2.8 DG DN Macro Art ($799) »
