I haven't ruled out picking up the 35/2 as it would be a little bit better all arounder. I find some magenta shading in the corners on my Tamron, a little bit more than I do on my CV, which I also find a little. I run both through Cornerfix with profiles I created. It's worth it though for my more serious landscape shooting, but is a little bit of a pain for just more casual shooting. So I could see the Tamron being my landscape only lens. I'd have to see if the Sigma is good enough stopped down to supplant the Tamron. I'm only shooting the a7R III, so it's possible I wouldn't be able to see a difference.
I have the Sigma 14-24, 105 macro, and now the 45 as well. So I have been drifting in the Sigma direction.
-Tim
Fred Miranda wrote: tsdevine wrote:
I think the closest match to that desire, at least right now, is the Tamron 35 f/2.8. It's the closest lens performance wise to my CV 50/2 APO.
I'm interested in a 28mm or 35mm APO from CV, but until then.....
-Tim
Frederik0711 wrote:
Sadly, not even the Sigma 35mm f/2 DN can resolve the whole sensor of the Sony a7R IV when stopped down. Still waiting patiently for a compact 35mm to be able to resolve the whole sensor at "landscape" apertures. I'm sure Voigtländer got this with a future 35mm f/2 APO-Lanthar. Might even prefer a 28mm APO if they make one. The 65mm DN seems to be outstanding all around, though.
The Tamron 35/2.8 is indeed incredible at infinity. Great landscape lens. I wonder how the new Sigma 35/2 will compare at f/4 and smaller apertures.
Dec 14, 2020 at 10:06 PM
Previous versions of tsdevine's message #15434718 « Pre-order: Sigma 24mm f/3.5, 35mm f/2 and 65mm f/2 DG DN lenses »
