361g vs. 215g ... (168%)
91mm vs. 64mm ... (142%)
93mm vs. 46mm ... (200%)
8463 mm^3 vs. 2944 mm^3 ... (287%)
$1,104 vs. $549 ... (200%)
Expectations
Or, you get what you pay for (size, weight, $$$).
For double the price, nearly double the weight and triple the volume ... I'd expect that it would perform better on many counts.
Rendering, otoh can be much more subjective.
Dec 13, 2020 at 09:29 PM
Previous versions of RustyBug's message #15433660 « Pre-order: Sigma 24mm f/3.5, 35mm f/2 and 65mm f/2 DG DN lenses »
