nhsonyshooter wrote: Holger wrote: Steve Spencer wrote: nhsonyshooter wrote: Fred Miranda wrote: Justin Stone wrote:
Rumored now by SAR to be only a little bigger than the 24 GM. That would be a revelation if the performance holds. I expected more like the ZA.
I'm skeptical it's about the same size as the 24GM but hope this is right.
Probably will be right in-between the 24GM and the 35mm Zeiss. And I'd be OK with that as long as it renders like the 24 Question is what is the price going to be
I don't think they can charge much if anymore than the Sigma 35 f/1.2 DG DN which costs $1,499 new.
Why? The GM is more expensive than the Sigma 85/1.4, the 135GM more expensive than the 135 Art and so on. Only because the Sigma is a 1.2, that doesn't mean it sets an upper limit, isn't it? I think 1599 to 1699 Euros is realistic.
Unfortunately I think your right. Makes you wonder if Sony really wants to sell lenses sometimes. I mean who is paying 1599.00 for a 5 year old Ziess 35mm in 2020?
Edit: I guess the same people buying the Rx1ii for 3200.00
The biggest problem with these forums is the total underestimated value of buying camera equipment. I personally produced 30 workshops for people just like this on a photo forum. Mostly medium format digital. The gear they showed up with made me look like a street rat. They would happily show up with 60 grand worth of gear and that's about 80 percent of them. I laugh every time some one mentions money on this forum. Photography is not my hobby golf is. You know how much my clubs cost. I can't say wife is close by. Rotflmao
Wish people give this money BS a rest. No problem be cares
nhsonyshooter wrote: Holger wrote: Steve Spencer wrote: nhsonyshooter wrote: Fred Miranda wrote: Justin Stone wrote:
Rumored now by SAR to be only a little bigger than the 24 GM. That would be a revelation if the performance holds. I expected more like the ZA.
I'm skeptical it's about the same size as the 24GM but hope this is right.
Probably will be right in-between the 24GM and the 35mm Zeiss. And I'd be OK with that as long as it renders like the 24 Question is what is the price going to be
I don't think they can charge much if anymore than the Sigma 35 f/1.2 DG DN which costs $1,499 new.
Why? The GM is more expensive than the Sigma 85/1.4, the 135GM more expensive than the 135 Art and so on. Only because the Sigma is a 1.2, that doesn't mean it sets an upper limit, isn't it? I think 1599 to 1699 Euros is realistic.
Unfortunately I think your right. Makes you wonder if Sony really wants to sell lenses sometimes. I mean who is paying 1599.00 for a 5 year old Ziess 35mm in 2020?
Edit: I guess the same people buying the Rx1ii for 3200.00
The biggest problem with these forums is the total underestimated value of buying camera equipment. I personally produced 30 workshops for people just like this on a photo forum. Mostly medium format digital. The gear they showed up with made me look like a street rat. They would happily show up with 60 grand worth of gear and that's about 80 percent of them. I laugh every time some one mentions money on this forum. Photography is not my hobby golf is. You know how much my clubs cost. I can't say wife is close by. Rotflmao
Wish people give this money BS a rest. P
Dec 07, 2020 at 08:17 PM
Previous versions of GMPhotography's message #15427178 « Pre-order: Sony FE 35mm f/1.4 GM ($1,399) »
Question is what is the price going to be