Re: In Stock: Sigma 105mm f/2.8 DG DN Macro Art ($799)
j4nu wrote:
Hmm, they look pretty similar to me, at @f2.8@ at least... Maybe Sigma seems a bit sharper depending on the part of the image I look at, but maybe I'm biased ...
Anyways, I think there will be Sigma review on lenstip soon, as it's already there on the polish sister(mother?) site: https://www.optyczne.pl/517.1-Test_obiektywu-Test_Sigma_A_105_mm_f_2.8_DG_DN_Macro.html
Spoiler alert: it sets their new sharpness record (@f4.0) .
Overall, similar to Dustin Abbott, they say it's optically superior to FE 90 and the only negative they list is slow AF. However, in the breakdown they also note that flare/ghosting is acceptable/good for such a lens, but not perfect.
It's hard to judge from the F2.8 photos because the colour/contrast is so different between the two but to my eye the Sigma is resending more detail than the VC based on the detail on the flashing just below the skylight.
Nov 27, 2020 at 03:43 PM
Previous versions of MIRANDA1's message #15416961 « In Stock: Sigma 105mm f/2.8 DG DN Macro Art ($799) »
...
.