Re: Sigma 24mm f/3.5, 35mm f/2.0 and 65mm f/2.0 DG DN FE lenses
j4nu wrote:
65mm seems a very peculiar choice of focal length to me on the other hand...
I'm not sure why this is seen as so strange. Everyone is very happy with the gaps between 20/21mm, 24mm, 28mm, 35mm, 40mm, 50mm etc. but as soon as you put something between 50mm and 85mm it's suddenly unusual.
I'm sure people with standard zoom lenses shoot images at 65mm quite frequently.
edit: here are the relative gaps rounded to 2 decimal places:
The following series of focal lengths has a much more even set of similar gaps whilst retaining nice round numbers (which I suspect is behind a lot of this) however no-one seems to make a 30mm for full frame:
Re: Sigma 24mm f/3.5, 35mm f/2.0 and 65mm f/2.0 DG DN FE lenses
j4nu wrote:
65mm seems a very peculiar choice of focal length to me on the other hand...
I'm not sure why this is seen as so strange. Everyone is very happy with the gaps between 20/21mm, 24mm, 28mm, 35mm, 40mm, 50mm etc. but as soon as you put something between 50mm and 85mm it's suddenly unusual.
I'm sure people with standard zoom lenses shoot images at 65mm quite frequently.
Nov 25, 2020 at 05:57 AM
Previous versions of Matt Grum's message #15414647 « Pre-order: Sigma 24mm f/3.5, 35mm f/2 and 65mm f/2 DG DN lenses »
