Matsaly wrote:
Although I haven't used it yet, one of the purported advantages of the R5/R6 is the IBIS. If I'm thinking it through correctly the IBIS seems to negate some of the "benefit" of the faster aperture of the 70-200 for MY use. If I was doing lots of indoor sports or concert work I could see the benefit of the faster aperture.
As before, I think it's going to ultimately be down to a subjective evaluation of how "comfortable" I feel lugging around either go the two lenses.
I soundly worry about IBIS. Both stabilize well, so you will do great handheld at 500. Subject motion may often be the limit.
The 70-200 is much more compact and light feeling almost like a normal mid range f2.8 zoom. The 100-500 is great but not in that category.
Oct 05, 2020 at 05:53 AM
Previous versions of Optics Patent's message #15366509 « Canon RF 70-200 or RF 100-500? »
