Re: Electronic Shutter Artifacts in Sony A9 and Canon 1DX3 Images
osv2 wrote:
...
just like the r5 tho, there is little to no advantage in real-world use, especially at the iso200-iso400 range that you are shooting at.
with canon using nr on the r5, i would also be concerned about loss of detail.
Are you saying you don't think the R5 doesn't benefits from 14 bit capture in the 200-400 range or are you saying the A9 II doesn't benefit from it and that range?
Also, any NR issues you are worried about on the R5 I don't really notice. That's not to say it doesn't exist, just to say its very well controlled and a lack of detail is not an issue that I'm finding.
Sep 17, 2020 at 11:08 AM
Previous versions of Mike Jacks0n's message #15350843 « Electronic Shutter Artifacts in Sony A9 and Canon 1DX3 Images »
