Charlie N wrote: mdvaden wrote: avalon27 wrote:
My interest is piqued to a degree.
A7RIII does over 95% of my stuff as a hobbyist (still deciding if I 'need' RIV) - my backup 6500 and RXIRII rarely get out, much as I love the output of the latter. This little camera might possibly replace the 2 backups and get out more.
I think the price is toppy at the moment - but I will watch real world reviews and thoughts of users here with interest.
Tony sure let the horses out of the barn when he recommended the Canon EOS R, regardless what he said following. But if this review is within reason, it seems a good used A7R iii would be a far better purchase since the size isn't much different, although there's a finger space difference worth noting.
Also, if IBIS of the A7C shouldn't be relied upon in low light, what lenses with image stabilization are available for a budget priced body that will maintain comfortable finger room?
I dont think that's an ibis problem.... it might be shutter shake or subject movement....... 1/50 for people shots? Tony N is an amateur.
This is an amateur camera, so I think Tony made a good point no matter how we look at it then. I gather Tony is good enough to exceed your criticism. But if he's not, there will be typical amateurs using it. Plus, the other aspect of the AF demonstrated, sort of implies what he said about IBIS can be believable.
Charlie N wrote: mdvaden wrote: avalon27 wrote:
My interest is piqued to a degree.
A7RIII does over 95% of my stuff as a hobbyist (still deciding if I 'need' RIV) - my backup 6500 and RXIRII rarely get out, much as I love the output of the latter. This little camera might possibly replace the 2 backups and get out more.
I think the price is toppy at the moment - but I will watch real world reviews and thoughts of users here with interest.
Tony sure let the horses out of the barn when he recommended the Canon EOS R, regardless what he said following. But if this review is within reason, it seems a good used A7R iii would be a far better purchase since the size isn't much different, although there's a finger space difference worth noting.
Also, if IBIS of the A7C shouldn't be relied upon in low light, what lenses with image stabilization are available for a budget priced body that will maintain comfortable finger room?
I dont think that's an ibis problem.... it might be shutter shake or subject movement....... 1/50 for people shots? Tony N is an amateur.
This is an amateur camera, so I think Tony made a good point no matter how we look at it then. I gather Tony is good enough to exceed your criticism. But if he's not, there will be typical amateurs using it. Plus, the other aspect of the AF demonstrated, sort of implies what he said about IBIS can be believable.
Re: Pre-order: Sony A7C Compact Full Frame ($1,798)
Charlie N wrote: mdvaden wrote: avalon27 wrote:
My interest is piqued to a degree.
A7RIII does over 95% of my stuff as a hobbyist (still deciding if I 'need' RIV) - my backup 6500 and RXIRII rarely get out, much as I love the output of the latter. This little camera might possibly replace the 2 backups and get out more.
I think the price is toppy at the moment - but I will watch real world reviews and thoughts of users here with interest.
Tony sure let the horses out of the barn when he recommended the Canon EOS R, regardless what he said following. But if this review is within reason, it seems a good used A7R iii would be a far better purchase since the size isn't much different, although there's a finger space difference worth noting.
Also, if IBIS of the A7C shouldn't be relied upon in low light, what lenses with image stabilization are available for a budget priced body that will maintain comfortable finger room?
I dont think that's an ibis problem.... it might be shutter shake or subject movement....... 1/50 for people shots? Tony N is an amateur.
This is an amateur camera, so I think Tony made a good point no matter how we look at it then. I gather Tony is good enough to exceed your criticism. But if he's not, there will be typical amateurs using it. Plus, the other aspect of the AF demonstrated, sort of implies what he said about IBIS can be believable.
Re: Pre-order: Sony A7C Compact Full Frame ($1,798)
Charlie N wrote: mdvaden wrote: avalon27 wrote:
My interest is piqued to a degree.
A7RIII does over 95% of my stuff as a hobbyist (still deciding if I 'need' RIV) - my backup 6500 and RXIRII rarely get out, much as I love the output of the latter. This little camera might possibly replace the 2 backups and get out more.
I think the price is toppy at the moment - but I will watch real world reviews and thoughts of users here with interest.
Tony sure let the horses out of the barn when he recommended the Canon EOS R, regardless what he said following. But if this review is within reason, it seems a good used A7R iii would be a far better purchase since the size isn't much different, although there's a finger space difference worth noting.
Also, if IBIS of the A7C shouldn't be relied upon in low light, what lenses with image stabilization are available for a budget priced body that will maintain comfortable finger room?
I dont think that's an ibis problem.... it might be shutter shake or subject movement....... 1/50 for people shots? Tony N is an amateur.
This is an amateur camera, so I think Tony made a good point no matter how we look at it then.
Sep 15, 2020 at 10:20 AM
Previous versions of mdvaden's message #15348513 « Pre-order: Sony A7C Compact Full Frame ($1,798) »
