NIKON NEWS -- Worse than I thought (*NOT my words).
Takira71A wrote:
This of course makes 'absolutely' no sense.
Those with LOTS of Nikon gear are (usually) more concerned about impending doom (Your words... Not mine).
That is why we have already seen comments on the Forum from Nikon Shooters who are concerned about the 'declining' value of their Nikon F-Mount Lenses (*Such as the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 800mm f/5.6E FL ED VR Lens).
--
This of course, is because, it would obviously take a lot more Time, Energy and Financial $$$ to replace a 'Complete' Nikon System...
Instead of just a mere, few Camera Bodies and Lenses.
--
Less equipment, actually means greater flexibility...Show more →
____
tntcorp wrote:
guess what, it is the longevity and maturity of the dslr which allowed the design to be disected and analyzed.
have you ever experienced a failure with the mirror mechanism of your dlsr? or do you just upgrade too quickly to recognize and appreciate the robustness of the dlsr systems.
i've inherited beaten up old slr gear and they still shoot film reliably. and the mirror mechanism in dslr have its foundation from slr gear. so the mechanism has been refined over the years.
not sure if the same can he said for milc tech at this point.
"less is more if the less has been proven"
Guess what?
You were so anxious... To try to get your DSLR vs. MILC 'longevity' viewpoint across in this Thread with 1bwana1...
That you posted your message reply to the wrong poster!
'Neither' Lance B or myself, were discussing longevity or maturity of the DSLR, DSLR robustness,
Mirror Mechanisms or even MILC etc. Therefore, your post has absolutely nothing to do with what the two of us were discussing.
--
No problem...
"We now take you back to our regularly scheduled programming."
NIKON NEWS -- Worse than I thought (*NOT my words).
Takira71A wrote:
This of course makes 'absolutely' no sense.
Those with LOTS of Nikon gear are (usually) more concerned about impending doom (Your words... Not mine).
That is why we have already seen comments on the Forum from Nikon Shooters who are concerned about the 'declining' value of their Nikon F-Mount Lenses (*Such as the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 800mm f/5.6E FL ED VR Lens).
--
This of course, is because, it would obviously take a lot more Time, Energy and Financial $$$ to replace a 'Complete' Nikon System...
Instead of just a mere, few Camera Bodies and Lenses.
--
Less equipment, actually means greater flexibility...Show more →
____
tntcorp wrote:
guess what, it is the longevity and maturity of the dslr which allowed the design to be disected and analyzed.
have you ever experienced a failure with the mirror mechanism of your dlsr? or do you just upgrade too quickly to recognize and appreciate the robustness of the dlsr systems.
i've inherited beaten up old slr gear and they still shoot film reliably. and the mirror mechanism in dslr have its foundation from slr gear. so the mechanism has been refined over the years.
not sure if the same can he said for milc tech at this point.
"less is more if the less has been proven"
Guess what?
You are so anxious... To try to get your DSLR vs. MILC 'longevity' viewpoint with 1bwana1 across in this Thread...
That you posted your message reply to the wrong poster!
'Neither' Lance B or myself, were discussing longevity or maturity of the DSLR, DSLR robustness,
Mirror Mechanisms or even MILC etc. Therefore, your post has absolutely nothing to do with what the two of us were discussing.
--
No problem...
"We now take you back to our regularly scheduled programming."
Sep 10, 2020 at 01:19 PM
Previous versions of Takira71A's message #15343472 « NIKON NEWS -- Worse than I thought (*NOT my words). »
