Re: NIKON NEWS -- Worse than I thought (*NOT my words).
tntcorp wrote:
Imagemaster wrote: tntcorp wrote:
sony has the sensor, but their camera bodies are not ergonomics and reliability is still a big question mark. likewise with the reliability of their lenses.
B.S. And how would you know?
name an a7 series body that have lasted +10 years, and a sony lenses that have lasted +15?
the dimensions of the a7 series bodies have been steadily increasing at each iteration for a reason.
Name a Nikon Z camera, or a Nikon S series lens that has lasted even 5 years. That only 1/2 the standard you are setting for the Sony equipment. There are none for the same reason that there are no a7 cameras 10 years old. Silly silly question you ask.
Plenty of Sony a7 series, and Sony lenses have lasted that long. No Nikon mirrorless ICL camera or native lens has.
The dimensions of Nikon bodies decreased as Nikon moved to mirrorless. This is a function of the cameras no longer needing a big fat mirrorbox. It has nothing to do with durability.
As you can see, this whole line of questioning is actually a meaningless proposition. Straight nonsensical logic.
Imagemaster's statement of B.S. seems valid enough.
Sep 07, 2020 at 10:04 PM
Previous versions of 1bwana1's message #15340554 « NIKON NEWS -- Worse than I thought (*NOT my words). »
