I jumped to his conclusion section because I can’t stand Matt.
“If you want a stills camera, this is a fantastic option. If you need a 4k30 camera, this is still a great option”
“If I was going to buy this camera, it would be to use 8k which I don’t already, and because it’s limited in 8k I’ll NEVER recommend it”. What?
Seems like a case of hearing what you want to hear. He’s also making an assumption that the A7S3 4K/120 won’t overheat.
1bwana1 wrote:
Another tester that found that the R5 is an amazingingly promising camera, but found the weird limitations in many areas made it unusable as a serious tool for his work. Unfortunately, this is becoming a theme it seems.
I think this guy used to call himself "that Nikon guy" before he switched to Sony last year.
Aug 08, 2020 at 05:50 PM
Previous versions of RoamingScott's message #15310129 « Sony-shooters thoughts on the Canon R5/R6 »