Previous versions of osv2's message #15310047 « Sony-shooters thoughts on the Canon R5/R6 »
osv2 Offline [X]
Re: Sony-shooters thoughts on the Canon R5/R6
mdvaden wrote: chez wrote:
Or look at it this way. The Canon 24-70...yes that's 24 not 28, is just over 800gm, a savings of over 600gm while gaining on the wide end. Or take the Tamron 28-75 coming in at 550gm...a whopping almost 900gm lighter. Don't tell me the 28-70 is not heavy...it's a pig compared to other lenses in that focal range.
Since I did not tell you it's not heavy, let's move to simple lesson about reading instead. I said it's not "too" heavy. It's easy to read above, so no need to repeat what's already in plain sight.
If you lack the strength to hold the equal of a DSLR and 70-200mm and DSLR comfortably, there are still thousands of women and men who can use that size gear effectively. Whether it's 70-200mm or the 28-70mm attached.
osv2 wrote:
beyond that, multiple reviewers have commented on r5/r6 ibis wobble:
And to take it a step beyond what you wrote, most reviewers speaking of the wobble conveyed it's commonplace among Sony and other brands or models
funny how that's not mentioned in the r5 vs. a7siii comparison video that i posted.
also humorous that you failed to comment on the other r5 ibis issues mentioned in that vid ;-)
Aug 08, 2020 at 04:23 PM
Previous versions of osv2's message #15310047 « Sony-shooters thoughts on the Canon R5/R6 »
