I see a lot of nit picking the r5 and r6 here. But the body is only a part of the overall equation. For me, glass and pro support are critically important. I think if we are being honest, Sony has some very very good glass. I think Canon as equally good glass and a heck of a lot more of it and and exponentially larger supply of used glass in the second hand market. And Canon has some very important glass that Sony just doesn't have and I think that is largely a one way road; Sony has very few if any pieces that Canon doesn't have. Pro Support goes to Canon by a long shot based on my experience with both (and not all of my CPS experience was perfect). Does Sony even have in house repair yet or do they still farm that out?
So yes, the r5 has me very curious and interested. If it is close to the a92 or a7r4 in AF performance, the other factors can change the equation on which is the better system.
Aug 08, 2020 at 08:45 AM
Previous versions of timgangloff's message #15309484 « Sony-shooters thoughts on the Canon R5/R6 »
