arbitrage wrote: vdo1 wrote: arbitrage wrote: scalanc2 wrote:
The final target is file quality.
All other things are complementary to it.
First point is how R5 file compares with ARIII file.
Without this precise answer any other point is of small interest to me.
Equal or better DR at all ISO values. R5 looks better to me for noise pattern. You can play around with DPR Studio scene to see how it looks through the scene and at different ISO. This is just a snapshot of noise at 3200.
So, according to the legend, the R5 forcefully applies noise reduction straight from ISO 50 up to 600? good job.
And, by the way, the R5 doesn't have a pixel shift function? Really? Thanks god it has "8K" instead lol
Thankfully I've never used or wanted to use a pixel shift function nor do I shoot below ISO 800 90% of the time.
Thankfully you are not a representative sample. Most photographers are well acquainted with the lower ISO range. And speaking from a still photography perspective, I'd rather have pixel shift than some half-baked "8k" video mode.
Aug 06, 2020 at 11:37 AM
Previous versions of vdo1's message #15307477 « Sony-shooters thoughts on the Canon R5/R6 »
