arbitrage wrote: scalanc2 wrote:
The final target is file quality.
All other things are complementary to it.
First point is how R5 file compares with ARIII file.
Without this precise answer any other point is of small interest to me.
Equal or better DR at all ISO values. R5 looks better to me for noise pattern. You can play around with DPR Studio scene to see how it looks through the scene and at different ISO. This is just a snapshot of noise at 3200.
So, according to the legend, the R5 forcefully applies noise reduction straight from ISO 50 up to 600? good job.
And, by the way, the R5 doesn't have a pixel shift function? Really?
arbitrage wrote: scalanc2 wrote:
The final target is file quality.
All other things are complementary to it.
First point is how R5 file compares with ARIII file.
Without this precise answer any other point is of small interest to me.
Equal or better DR at all ISO values. R5 looks better to me for noise pattern. You can play around with DPR Studio scene to see how it looks through the scene and at different ISO. This is just a snapshot of noise at 3200.
So, according to the legend, the R5 forcefully applies noise reduction straight from ISO 50 up to 600? good job.
Aug 06, 2020 at 07:37 AM
Previous versions of vdo1's message #15307276 « Sony-shooters thoughts on the Canon R5/R6 »
