mdvaden wrote: TeamSpeed wrote: mdvaden wrote: Ralph Conway wrote:
Offering a feature that no competitor is able to offer is criticized because it is fixed to a limited time? This shows how cracy expectations have got.
.
Exactly, and why I posted yesterday about people whining because Canon didn't use a cripple hammer.
One thing that would be sort of cool though. Wonder if Canon could ever run a tiny cooling tube in the body that an add-on unit the size of a grip could super charge cooling. A cooling grip.
Then you give up the weather sealing... It's nearly difficult to keep the body size down, but yet provide enough air inside to help cooling, add weather sealing.
Doubt that ...
It's possible to weather seal a double ended tube or system within another .. as simple as one or two O-rings at each side.
lol .. don't apply for the design job on that one.
Geez .. our house is mostly weather sealed and heat is transferred both ways for our HVAC system. And the material in the line stays in the coils and lines.
Doubt it would be cheap, and maybe not practical, but it could be done. But the key to success, is not handing the reigns to anyone who can't believe to get the job done.
Yes, your house is a great analogy for a camera that could be in any angle in a downpour and with a lens attached, and has all kinds of buttons and controls. I am sure if rain hit your house at all kinds of angles, you would still have a completely dry house with nothing seeping in anywhere, and that excludes the fact that you don't have a large opening that you stuff with something and hope the rains don't get in, or that you have all these huge buttons and wheels on your house (unless you live in a mobile home).
How big do you want that camera again, with a fan and space to run air with venting, etc?
No, the way to seal this is with heat dissipation on plates or transfer through a liquid in a closed system. It won't be with a fan and venting to circulate air through the camera, lol.
Again, the overheating just isn't a big concern for many of us, if not most of us so it doesn't really matter what they could or couldn't do. Also, the manufacturing numbers are so low, that Canon will likely sell out of their initial productions regardless of this issue. I am sure you don't care about the overheating too, so for once we might be on the same page where we weren't at all on the R. This camera might actually be a good replacement for the 5D4 where the R wasn't for what I shoot.
mdvaden wrote: TeamSpeed wrote: mdvaden wrote: Ralph Conway wrote:
Offering a feature that no competitor is able to offer is criticized because it is fixed to a limited time? This shows how cracy expectations have got.
.
Exactly, and why I posted yesterday about people whining because Canon didn't use a cripple hammer.
One thing that would be sort of cool though. Wonder if Canon could ever run a tiny cooling tube in the body that an add-on unit the size of a grip could super charge cooling. A cooling grip.
Then you give up the weather sealing... It's nearly difficult to keep the body size down, but yet provide enough air inside to help cooling, add weather sealing.
Doubt that ...
It's possible to weather seal a double ended tube or system within another .. as simple as one or two O-rings at each side.
lol .. don't apply for the design job on that one.
Geez .. our house is mostly weather sealed and heat is transferred both ways for our HVAC system. And the material in the line stays in the coils and lines.
Doubt it would be cheap, and maybe not practical, but it could be done. But the key to success, is not handing the reigns to anyone who can't believe to get the job done.
Yes, your house is a great analogy for a camera that could be in any angle in a downpour and with a lens attached, and has all kinds of buttons and controls. I am sure if rain hit your house at all kinds of angles, you would still have a completely dry house with nothing seeping in anywhere, and that excludes the fact that you don't have a large opening that you stuff with something and hope the rains don't get in, or that you have all these huge buttons and wheels on your house (unless you live in a mobile home).
How big do you want that camera again, with a fan and space to run air with venting, etc?
No, the way to seal this is with heat dissipation on plates or transfer through a liquid in a closed system.
Again, the overheating just isn't a big concern for many of us, if not most of us so it doesn't really matter what they could or couldn't do. Also, the manufacturing numbers are so low, that Canon will likely sell out of their initial productions regardless of this issue. I am sure you don't care about the overheating too, so for once we might be on the same page where we weren't at all on the R. This camera might actually be a good replacement for the 5D4 where the R wasn't for what I shoot.
Jul 12, 2020 at 03:18 PM
Previous versions of TeamSpeed's message #15281212 « Canon R5 R6 Reviews LIST/HUB, see 1st post // review hands on specs »
I am sure you don't care about the overheating too, so for once we might be on the same page where we weren't at all on the R. This camera might actually be a good replacement for the 5D4 where the R wasn't for what I shoot.