AvianScott wrote:
The 5DsR does have an AA filter, the effects of it are canceled by another filter. The R5 purportedly has a similar AA filter, but the canceling effect is actually better than that of the 5DsR thus giving the R5 the appearance of having more resolution.
"The 45MP sensor in the R5 is a brand new design, and Canon claims that it’s actually the highest-resolving sensor it has ever produced – delivering detail even higher than that of the Canon EOS 5DS / R, which has a 50.6MP sensor. This is because it features the same redesigned low-pass filter seen in the flagship Canon EOS-1D X Mark III, with 16-point subsampling that results in supreme image quality."
5DSR has the cancelling but the R5 does not? Or it would be a R5R?
-----------------
Just to be clear above.
An AA generally is used to blur at the pixel level so that moire can be avoided. This causes the need to sharpen to improve the perceived resolution for presentation.
The 5DSR does have an AA filter and then another filter that reverses it - thus it is equivalent to no AA. [Thats what I meant by no AA.]
Whereas I don't think the R5 has the same reversal. But it has a much more sophisticated AA filter.
So the questions are:
1) Does the AA/ reverse AA of 5DSR cause distortion that reduced resolution
2) Is the new AA on r5 better than the AA/reverse AA for resolution
AvianScott wrote:
The 5DsR does have an AA filter, the effects of it are canceled by another filter. The R5 purportedly has a similar AA filter, but the canceling effect is actually better than that of the 5DsR thus giving the R5 the appearance of having more resolution.
"The 45MP sensor in the R5 is a brand new design, and Canon claims that it’s actually the highest-resolving sensor it has ever produced – delivering detail even higher than that of the Canon EOS 5DS / R, which has a 50.6MP sensor. This is because it features the same redesigned low-pass filter seen in the flagship Canon EOS-1D X Mark III, with 16-point subsampling that results in supreme image quality."
5DSR has the cancelling but the R5 does not? Or it would be a R5R?
-----------------
Just to be clear above.
An AA generally is used to blur at the pixel level so that moire can be avoided. This causes the need to sharpen to improve the perceived resolution for presentation.
The 5DSR does have an AA filter and then another filter that reverses it - thus it is equivalent to no AA. [Thats what I meant by no AA.]
Whereas I don't think the R5 has the same reversal. But it has a much more sophisticated AA filter.
So the questions are:
1) Does the AA/ reverse AA of 5DSR cause distortion that reduced resolution
2) Is the new AA on r5 better than the AA/reverse AA for resolution to offset the lower resolution
AvianScott wrote:
The 5DsR does have an AA filter, the effects of it are canceled by another filter. The R5 purportedly has a similar AA filter, but the canceling effect is actually better than that of the 5DsR thus giving the R5 the appearance of having more resolution.
"The 45MP sensor in the R5 is a brand new design, and Canon claims that it’s actually the highest-resolving sensor it has ever produced – delivering detail even higher than that of the Canon EOS 5DS / R, which has a 50.6MP sensor. This is because it features the same redesigned low-pass filter seen in the flagship Canon EOS-1D X Mark III, with 16-point subsampling that results in supreme image quality."
5DSR has the cancelling but the R5 does not? Or it would be a R5R?
-----------------
Just to be clear above.
An AA generally is used to blur at the pixel level so that moire can be avoided. This causes the need to sharpen to improve the perceived resolution for presentation.
The 5DSR does have an AA filter and then another filter that reverses it - thus it is equivalent to no AA. [Thats what I meant by no AA.]
Whereas I don't think the R5 has the same reversal. But it has a much more sophisticated AA filter.
But R5 has a new AA filter that is far more sophisticated. So the questions are:
1) Does the AA/ reverse AA of 5DSR cause distortion that reduced resolution
2) Is the new AA on r5 better than the AA/reverse AA for resolution to offset the lower resolution
Jul 10, 2020 at 12:17 PM
Previous versions of Scott Stoness's message #15278665 « R5 vs 5DSR Landscape and the AA filter - DPR has comparisons »
