My copies, of the pf500 is sharper than the 70-200 fl, or maybe Iam having to crop more with the 70-200 fl or I have to fine tune the 70-200 fl with the d500
1st photo with some iso noise. It was early morning.
this could have been much better with the pf500
I lost the highlights on the bird body/slightly overexposed.
My copies, of the pf500 is sharper than the 70-200 fl, or maybe Iam having to crop more with the 70-200 fl or I have to fine tune the 70-200 fl with the d500
1st photo with some iso noise. It was early morning.
this could have been much better with the pf500
I lost the highlights on the bird body/slightly overexposed.
My copies, of the pf500 is sharper than the 70-200 fl, or maybe Iam having to crop more with the 70-200 fl or I have to fine tune the 70-200 fl with the d500
1st photo with some iso noise. It was early morning.
this could have been much better with the pf500
I lost the highlights on the bird body/slightly overexposed.
My copies, of the pf500 is sharper than the 70-200 fl, or maybe Iam having to crop more with the 70-200 fl or I have to fine tune the 70-200 fl with the d500
1st photo with some iso noise. It was early morning.
this could have been much better with the pf500
I lost the highlights on the bird body/slightly overexposed.
My copies, of the pf500 is sharper than the 70-200 fl, or maybe Iam having to crop more with the 70-200 fl or I have to fine tune the 70-200 fl with the d500
1st photo with some iso noise. It was early morning.
this could have been much better with the pf500
I lost the highlights on the bird body/slightly overexposed.
Jul 05, 2020 at 06:17 AM
Previous versions of NissanPatrol's message #15272882 « Official D500 Image Thread »
