Tamron Zoom Shootout (28-75, 28-200, 35-150 EF, and 70-180)
90/135mm
The 28-200 starts opening up the gap on the 18-135 again. At no point has the 18-135 APSC lens been better than the FF 28-200 at any point in the frame, but it seemed to come the closest at the previous two focal lengths. At this point the 28-200 has put it's foot back on the gas. The first two images show the comparison to the 18-135. The second two images show the 28-200 at 135mm shot on the first day (left) and today (right). I don't know what to say... the images look way, way better for the 28-200 today. I explained my methodology last time, but I can only guess the AF-S in 12.4x (I kept saying 12.8x by mistake) freaked out in the harsh light and dark shadows from last time vs the soft, even, overcast light today? I really hope I didn't give the 28-200 a bad wrap with anyone, so I have gone back to my original posts an added notes to see the results from today before maligning the 28-200, which just keeps looking better.
