I thought it was pretty well documented that the 200-600 with the A7RIV is not an ideal combination for fast-moving action and that the 100-400 produces better results. I’ve been saying for a long time that I think it’s just really wishful thinking that the 200-600 would perform as well as any of the GM lenses, including the 100-400, given its reach, range of reach, and its low price. I can believe that Sony have priced it for lower margins but even then, something has to give when you’re getting all what it offers for such a low price.
I’ve personally never owned the 200-600 but I’ve read enough about it, and talked to many clients, followers on my YouTube channel, and other photographers about it, and it’s not a lens I would recommend with the A7RIV.
Now I know there are some people who have the combination and swear by it but I really do wonder how much they are pushing the gear.
Although I don’t shoot with the 100-400 and it is pretty faultless for what it is. Unfortunately I moved to the 400 GM before the A7RIV came out so I’ve never owned the combo personally but I know plenty of people with that combo and have never heard of a complaint.
May 09, 2020 at 09:00 AM
Previous versions of 2xbass's message #15222643 « Giving up on a7RIV and 200-600 :-( »
