Re: Voigtländer SE series lenses announced (35/1.2, 40/1.2, 50/1.2)
Beni wrote: cwnchkn wrote:
If this version has less copy variation I am so getting another 40/1.2.
I'd not heard about Voigt copy variation. Is this specific to the 40 1.2?
CV has traditionally been associated with high copy variation and service problems.
They were never on the same plane as Zeiss despite being manufactured by the same company.
They cost less but you got less.
The general opinion is that the company has really "upped its game" in recent years but I do not know the extent of that change.
The line is very popular here so that seems a good endorsement.
Re: Voigtländer SE series lenses announced (35/1.2, 40/1.2, 50/1.2)
Beni wrote: cwnchkn wrote:
If this version has less copy variation I am so getting another 40/1.2.
I'd not heard about Voigt copy variation. Is this specific to the 40 1.2?
CV has traditionally been associated with high copy variation and service problems.
They were never on the same plane as Zeiss despite being manufactured by the same company.
They cost less but you got less.
The general opinion is that the company has really "upped its game" in recent years but I do not know the extent of that change.
The line is very popular here so that seems a good endorsement.
Re: Voigtländer SE series lenses announced (35/1.2, 40/1.2, 50/1.2)
Beni wrote: cwnchkn wrote:
If this version has less copy variation I am so getting another 40/1.2.
I'd not heard about Voigt copy variation. Is this specific to the 40 1.2?
CV has traditionally been associated with high copy variation and service problems.
They were never on the same plane as Zeiss despite being manufactured by the same company.
They cost less but you got less.
The general opinion is that the company has really "upped its game" in recent years but I do not know the extent of that change.
The line is very popular here so that seems a good endorsement.
Re: Voigtländer SE series lenses announced (35/1.2, 40/1.2, 50/1.2)
Beni wrote: cwnchkn wrote:
If this version has less copy variation I am so getting another 40/1.2.
I'd not heard about Voigt copy variation. Is this specific to the 40 1.2?
CV has traditionally been associated with high copy variation and service problems.
They were never on the same plane as Zeiss despite being manufactured by the same company.
They cost less but you got less.
The general opinion is that the company has really "upped its game" in recent years but I do not know the extent of that change.
The line is very popular here so that seems a good endorsement.
Re: Voigtländer SE series lenses announced (35/1.2, 40/1.2, 50/1.2)
Beni wrote: cwnchkn wrote:
If this version has less copy variation I am so getting another 40/1.2.
I'd not heard about Voigt copy variation. Is this specific to the 40 1.2?
CV has traditionally been associated with high copy variation and service problems.
They were never on the same plane as Zeiss despite being manufactured by the same company.
They cost less but you got less.
The general opinion is that the company has really "upped its game" in recent years but I do not know the extent of that change.
The line is very popular here so that seems a good endorsement.
Re: Voigtländer SE series lenses announced (35/1.2, 40/1.2, 50/1.2)
Beni wrote: cwnchkn wrote:
If this version has less copy variation I am so getting another 40/1.2.
I'd not heard about Voigt copy variation. Is this specific to the 40 1.2?
CV has traditionally been associated with high copy variation and service problems.
They were never on the same plane as Zeiss despite being manufactured by the same company.
They cost less but you got less.
The general opinion is that the company has really "upped its game" in recent years but I do not know the extent of that change.
The line is very popular here so that seems a good endorsement.
Re: Voigtländer SE series lenses announced (35/1.2, 40/1.2, 50/1.2)
Beni wrote: cwnchkn wrote:
If this version has less copy variation I am so getting another 40/1.2.
I'd not heard about Voigt copy variation. Is this specific to the 40 1.2?
CV has traditionally been associated with high copy variation and service problems.
They were never on the same plane as Zeiss despite being manufactured by the same company.
They cost less but you got less.
The general opinion is that the company has really "upped its game" in recent years but I do not know the extent of that change.
The line is very popular here so that seems a good endorsement.
Re: Voigtländer SE series lenses announced (35/1.2, 40/1.2, 50/1.2)
Beni wrote: cwnchkn wrote:
If this version has less copy variation I am so getting another 40/1.2.
I'd not heard about Voigt copy variation. Is this specific to the 40 1.2?
CV has traditionally been associated with high copy variation and service problems.
They were never on the same plane as Zeiss despite being manufactured by the same company.
They cost less but you got less.
The general opinion is that the company has really "upped its game" in recent years but I do not know the extent of that change.
The line is very popular here so that seems a good endorsement.
Re: Voigtländer SE series lenses announced (35/1.2, 40/1.2, 50/1.2)
Beni wrote: cwnchkn wrote:
If this version has less copy variation I am so getting another 40/1.2.
I'd not heard about Voigt copy variation. Is this specific to the 40 1.2?
CV has traditionally been associated with high copy variation and service problems.
They were never on the same plane as Zeiss despite being manufactured by the same company.
They cost less but you got less.
The general opinion is that they company has really "upped its game" in recent years but I do not know the extent of that change.
The line is very popular here so that seems a good endorsement.
I have two CV; they seem to be good copies.
Apr 20, 2020 at 09:27 AM
Previous versions of DaveFP's message #15206173 « Voigtländer SE series lenses announced (35/1.2, 40/1.2, 50/1.2) »
