arbitrage wrote:
Yeah, I understand all that but Dan made at least two mentions of Sony directly going after Canon users and Dan even goes as far as saying they forego their own lens development to go after Canon glass owners....I call hogwash on that because there is no evidence of that and it is blatantly false information that they made an EF adapter.
I made at least one error and perhaps two, though I don't think they change my overall point.
1. I mentioned A7rII where I meant to refer to the 36MP A7r which had a sensor equivalent to that in the D800 and (more accurately, perhaps) the D800e.
2. I apologize if I'm mistaken about Sony producing/selling an adapter to use Canon lenses on the A7r. Was that only third-party stuff? Given the overwhelming argument that photographers could take their Canon lenses along to the A7r, the enthusiasm for doing so, and the fact that this was the only initial route to having necessary lenses at first...
After acknowledging and correcting those errors, I think my basic analysis is still correct.
arbitrage wrote:
Yeah, I understand all that but Dan made at least two mentions of Sony directly going after Canon users and Dan even goes as far as saying they forego their own lens development to go after Canon glass owners....I call hogwash on that because there is no evidence of that and it is blatantly false information that they made an EF adapter.
I made at least one error and perhaps two, though I don't think they change my overall point.
1. I mentioned A7rII where I meant to refer to the 36MP A7r which had a sensor equivalent to that in the D800 and (more accurately, perhaps) the D800e.
2. I apologize if I'm mistaken about Sony producing/selling an adapter to use Canon lenses on the A7r. Was that only third-party stuff? Given the overwhelming argument that photographers could take their Canon lenses along to the A7r, the enthusiasm for doing so, and the fact that this was the only initial route to having necessary lenses at first...
After acknowledging those errors, I think my basic analysis is still correct.
Dan
Feb 23, 2020 at 08:44 PM
Previous versions of gdanmitchell's message #15152382 « EOS-R5....will it live up to the hype? »
