The EOS R literally accomplished certain features that even Sony never attained so seamlessly.
Was that the feature of being able to shoot at a whopping 3FPS with Tracking Priority in AI Servo?
I get paid up to $800 per single photo shooting one frame per 5 seconds.
The mumbo jumbo you are writing about is a nothing burger in regards to what I get from the EOS R body.
If you can't succeed with an EOS R .. simple. Don't buy one.
If you couldn't have gotten the same results with the other gear you own or did own, then something is wrong already with your assessment. Your stitched landscape photos don't need high speed bursts, and could have been done with an M series even. Doing static scenery stitched photos isn't some magic sauce found on the EOS R. I feel you are being very misleading. One has to consider the fact that it doesn't matter how much you make per photo, that has nothing to do with the camera, it has to do with you being networked with the right folks, you being marketable as a photographer, and you being in the right place at the right time. If you feel the gear defines you, that is an issue.
The R is a good start but is lacking in many areas and even required a firmware update to fix something that was rushed. The R was only successful because it was the first Canon FF mirrorless not because it was class leading.
The EOS R literally accomplished certain features that even Sony never attained so seamlessly.
Was that the feature of being able to shoot at a whopping 3FPS with Tracking Priority in AI Servo?
I get paid up to $800 per single photo shooting one frame per 5 seconds.
The mumbo jumbo you are writing about is a nothing burger in regards to what I get from the EOS R body.
If you can't succeed with an EOS R .. simple. Don't buy one.
If you couldn't have gotten the same results with the other gear you own or did own, then something is wrong already with your assessment. Your stitched landscape photos don't need high speed bursts, and could have been done with an M series even. Doing static scenery stitched photos isn't some magic sauce found on the EOS R and I feel you are being very misleading, combined with the fact that it doesn't matter how much you make per photo, that has nothing to do with the camera, it has to do with you being networked with the right folks, you being marketable as a photographer, and you being in the right place at the right time. If you feel the gear defines you, that is an issue.
The R is a good start but is lacking in many areas and even required a firmware update to fix something that was rushed. The R was only successful because it was the first Canon FF mirrorless not because it was class leading.
The EOS R literally accomplished certain features that even Sony never attained so seamlessly.
Was that the feature of being able to shoot at a whopping 3FPS with Tracking Priority in AI Servo?
I get paid up to $800 per single photo shooting one frame per 5 seconds.
The mumbo jumbo you are writing about is a nothing burger in regards to what I get from the EOS R body.
If you can't succeed with an EOS R .. simple. Don't buy one.
If you couldn't have gotten the same results with the other gear you own or did own, then something is wrong already with your assessment. The R is a good start but is lacking in many areas and even required a firmware update to fix something that was rushed. The R was only successful because it was the first Canon FF mirrorless not because it was class leading.
Feb 16, 2020 at 07:32 AM
Previous versions of TeamSpeed's message #15144712 « EOS-R5....will it live up to the hype? »
