I pretty much shoot only in poor conditions at 6400 ISO for dance action in performance. As a system the A9 is better than CaNikon for these various reasons:
1. much better AF (all over the frame) with tracking eye/face AI.
2. ability to use super speed lenses wide open because of no micro AF error.
3. more uniform exposure since I’m looking at the light off of the sensor.
4. 20 fps-more-shots to choose from.
5. silent shutter-more shots to choose from.
6. 24mP-a bit more crop-ability verses the 18mP of that day.
7. three A9’s cost/weight take up the spaces of 2 D5/!DxII so I can buy/use 3 bodies/lenses-not 2.
Feb 14, 2020 at 04:22 AM
Previous versions of SoundHound's message #15142865 « How is Sony Image quality better than Canon? »
