So someone asked for comparison between the CV 50/2 and CV 65/2. Here's my attempt. Note, it serves no artistic purpose and is basically just trying to tease out aberrations. I'm throwing in the FE 50/2 as a freebie. All shot on the a7R III. I processed these through PhotoNinja to make sure that there wasn't some flag on the RAW turning on corrections. (PN doesn't support that feature.) No added sharpening, minimum adjustments.
All those jumping all over the 50, I'm not seeing it being substantially different than the 65. The 65 isn't perfect either (a lens that isn't perfect....news at 11.) Both are noticeably better than 55.
So someone asked for comparison between the CV 50/2 and CV 65/2. Here's my attempt. Note, it serves no artistic purpose and is basically just trying to tease out aberrations. I'm throwing in the FE 50/2 as a freebie. All shot on the a7R III. I processed these through PhotoNinja to make sure that there wasn't some flag on the RAW turning on corrections. (PN doesn't support that feature.)
All those jumping all over the 50, I'm not seeing it being substantially different than the 65. The 65 isn't perfect either (a lens that isn't perfect....news at 11.) Both are noticeably better than 55.
So someone asked for comparison between the CV 50/2 and CV 65/2. Here's my attempt. Note, it serves no artistic purpose and is basically just trying to tease out aberrations. I'm throwing in the FE 50/2 as a freebie. All shot on the a7R III. I processed these through PhotoNinja to make sure that there wasn't some flag on the RAW turning on corrections. (PN doesn't support that feature.)
All those jumping all over the 50, I'm not seeing it being substantially different than the 65. The 65 isn't perfect either (a lens that isn't perfect....news at 11.) Both are noticeably better than 55.
All shot on the a7R III. I processed these through PhotoNinja to make sure that there wasn't some flag on the RAW turning on corrections. (PN doesn't support that feature.) No added sharpening, minimum adjustments.
