T-O Shooter wrote:
As he said, you can get great images (as you can with any current body) but it's the misses that's the issue.
The problem is, the "misses" don't affect most people anywhere near as much as he (or most others who want to lambast the Z6/7) think. It just isn't an issue for the 99+% who own the camera. If it does worry them that much, they obviously bought the wrong camera. The lambasters keep trying to harp on one or two points as if this makes the whole camera unusable when in fact it just isn't an issue at all to just about everyone who owns one. It seems as though unless a camera is top of the pile in *every* aspect it can't be used. So, in order to click bait the *gullible*, they have to be so controversial, so polarizing, that people have to look in order to have an informed opinion in any discussion brought up on the matter because someone with an agenda throws it up on a forum and then ask, "did you watch the video?", if you didn't then you can't argue with what he said or you have your "head in the sand". It's a perfect way to get yourself out there and get click bait. I just wonder why normal, and what I would have thought intelligent people (probably an agenda), fall for this stuff. Make outlandish claims that the gullible fall for and then let it run it's course. Make hyperbolic claims because first impressions are always believed more than reality or any level headed reply as people couldn't be bothered reading any rebuttal of the original claim. It's just so typical of the herd mentality which is so everywhere these days on the net. Not only that, but people want to think they have the best just because some internet screamer says it's so, whether you need it or not is irrelevant and whether it really is or not is also irrelevant, but you can say to your mates, I have the best because some internet nobody says so. Interestingly, the Z's seem to be gaining traction probably due to the fact that people have smartened up and found that just having the best tracking AF isn't as important as having a camera they love to use and gets them fantastic results for things they actually need/want the camera for.
What intrigues me TO, is that you feel the need to keep pushing this agenda as if somehow things will change in your mind. You have already decided that the Z's are definitely *not* for you so what is there in it for you other than to stir up rubbish. You know you are *never* going to buy a Z6/7 so why push this typical click bait. There is *nothing* served by this sort of thing unless you have some interest in it with Jared Polin or have an unfinished agenda. I mean, what can it be so annoying to you about the Zeds that you feel the need to keep harping on about both there and over on DPR. It shouldn't matter to you whether someone likes their Z6/7 better than the D750 or D850 just like I don't care if you like your D850 better than a Z. It also doesn't mean they can't use both either (like me) - you know, "right tool for the job". We get it, we know you don't like the Zeds, just be happy with your beloved D5 and D850 and move on. Others are supremely happy with their Z6/7 and life goes on. Also, being the best at everything doesn't mean the same as best for everyone.
T-O Shooter wrote:
As he said, you can get great images (as you can with any current body) but it's the misses that's the issue.
The problem is, the "misses" don't affect most people anywhere near as much as he (or most others who want to lambast the Z6/7) think. It just isn't an issue for the 99+% who own the camera. If it does worry them that much, they obviously bought the wrong camera. The lambasters keep trying to harp on one or two points as if this makes the whole camera unusable when in fact it just isn't an issue at all to just about everyone who owns one. It seems as though unless a camera is top of the pile in *every* aspect it can't be used. So, in order to click bait the *gullible*, they have to be so controversial, so polarizing, that people have to look in order to have an informed opinion in any discussion brought up on the matter because someone with an agenda throws it up on a forum and then ask, "did you watch the video?", if you didn't then you can't argue with what he said or you have your "head in the sand". It's a perfect way to get yourself out there and get click bait. I just wonder why normal, and what I would have thought intelligent people (probably an agenda), fall for this stuff. Make outlandish claims that the gullible fall for and then let it run it's course. Make hyperbolic claims because first impressions are always believed more than reality or any level headed reply as people couldn't be bothered reading any rebuttal of the original claim. It's just so typical of the herd mentality which is so everywhere these days on the net. Not only that, but people want to think they have the best just because some internet screamer says it's so, whether you need it or not is irrelevant and whether it really is or not is also irrelevant, but you can say to your mates, I have the best because some internet nobody says so. Interestingly, the Z's seem to be gaining traction probably due to the fact that people have smartened up and found that just having the best tracking AF isn't as important as having a camera they love to use and gets them fantastic results for things they actually need/want the camera for.
What intrigues me TO, is that you feel the need to keep pushing this so-called "issue" and a point of view as if somehow things will change in your mind. You have already decided that the Z's are definitely *not* for you so what is there in it for you other than to stir up rubbish. You know you are *never* going to buy a Z6/7 so why push this typical click bait. There is *nothing* served by this sort of thing unless you have some interest in it with Jared Polin or have an unfinished agenda. I mean, what can it be so annoying to you about the Zeds that you feel the need to keep harping on about both there and over on DPR. It shouldn't matter to you whether someone likes their Z6/7 better than the D750 or D850 just like I don't care if you like your D850 better than a Z. It also doesn't mean they can't use both either (like me) - you know, "right tool for the job". We get it, we know you don't like the Zeds, just be happy with your beloved D5 and D850 and move on. Others are supremely happy with their Z6/7 and life goes on. Also, being the best at everything doesn't mean the same as best for everyone.
T-O Shooter wrote:
As he said, you can get great images (as you can with any current body) but it's the misses that's the issue.
The problem is, the "misses" don't affect most people anywhere near as much as he (or most others who want to lambast the Z6/7) think. It just isn't an issue for the 99+% who own the camera. If it does worry them that much, they obviously bought the wrong camera. The lambasters keep trying to harp on one or two points as if this makes the whole camera unusable when in fact it just isn't an issue at all to just about everyone who owns one. It seems as though unless a camera is top of the pile in *every* aspect it can't be used. So, in order to click bait the *gullible*, they have to be so controversial, so polarizing, that people have to look in order to have an informed opinion in any discussion brought up on the matter because someone with an agenda throws it up on a forum and then ask, "did you watch the video?", if you didn't then you can't argue with what he said or you have your "head in the sand". It's a perfect way to get yourself out there and get click bait. I just wonder why normal, and what I would have thought intelligent people (probably an agenda), fall for this stuff. Make outlandish claims that the gullible fall for and then let it run it's course. Make hyperbolic claims because first impressions are always believed more than reality or any level headed reply as people couldn't be bothered reading any rebuttal of the original claim. It's just so typical of the herd mentality which is so everywhere these days on the net. Not only that, but people want to think they have the best just because some internet screamer says it's so, whether you need it or not is irrelevant and whether it really is or not is also irrelevant, but you can say to your mates, I have the best because some internet nobody says so. Interestingly, the Z's seem to be gaining traction probably due to the fact that people have wisened up and found that just having the best tracking AF isn't as important as having a camera they love to use and gets them fantastic results for things they actually need/want the camera for.
What intrigues me TO, is that you feel the need to keep pushing this so-called "issue" and a point of view as if somehow things will change in your mind. You have already decided that the Z's are definitely *not* for you so what is there in it for you other than to stir up rubbish. You know you are *never* going to buy a Z6/7 so why push this typical click bait. There is *nothing* served by this sort of thing unless you have some interest in it with Jared Polin or have an unfinished agenda. I mean, what can it be so annoying to you about the Zeds that you feel the need to keep harping on about both there and over on DPR. It shouldn't matter to you whether someone likes their Z6/7 better than the D750 or D850 just like I don't care if you like your D850 better than a Z. It also doesn't mean they can't use both either (like me) - you know, "right tool for the job". We get it, we know you don't like the Zeds, just be happy with your beloved D5 and D850 and move on. Others are supremely happy with their Z6/7 and life goes on. Also, being the best at everything doesn't mean the same as best for everyone.
T-O Shooter wrote:
As he said, you can get great images (as you can with any current body) but it's the misses that's the issue.
The problem is, the "misses" don't affect most people anywhere near as much as he (or most others who want to lambast the Z6/7) think. It just isn't an issue for the 99+% who own the camera. If it does worry them that much, they obviously bought the wrong camera. The lambasters keep trying to harp on one or two points as if this makes the whole camera unusable when in fact it just isn't an issue at all to just about everyone who owns one. It seems as though unless a camera is top of the pile in *every* aspect it can't be used. So, in order to click bait the *gullible*, they have to be so controversial, so polarizing, that people have to look in order to have an informed opinion in any discussion brought up on the matter because someone with an agenda throws it up on a forum and then ask, "did you watch the video?", if you didn't then you can't argue with what he said or you have your "head in the sand". It's a perfect way to get yourself out there and get click bait. I just wonder why normal, and what I would have thought intelligent people (probably an agenda), fall for this stuff. Make outlandish claims that the gullible fall for and then let it run it's course. Make hyperbolic claims because first impressions are always believed more than reality or any level headed reply as people couldn't be bothered reading any rebuttal of the original claim. It's just so typical of the herd mentality which is so everywhere these days on the net. Not only that, but people want to think they have the best just because some internet screamer says it's so, whether you need it or not is irrelevant and whether it really is or not is also irrelevant, but you can say to your mates, I have the best because some internet nobody says so. Interestingly, the Z's seem to be gaining traction probably due to the fact that people have wisened up and found that just having the best tracking AF isn't as important as having a camera they love to use and gets them fantastic results for things they actually need/want the camera for.
What intrigues me TO, is that you feel the need to keep pushing this so-called "issue" and a point of view as if somehow things will change in your mind. You have already decided that the Z's are definitely *not* for you so what is there in it for you other than to stir up rubbish. You know you are *never* going to buy a Z6/7 so why push this typical click bait. There is *nothing* served by this sort of thing unless you have some interest in it with Jared Polin or have an unfinished agenda. I mean, what can it be so annoying to you about the Zeds that you feel the need to keep harping on about both there and over on DPR. It shouldn't matter to you whether someone likes their Z6/7 better than the D750 or D850 just like I don't care if you like your D850 better than a Z. It also doesn't mean they can't use both either (like me) - you know, "right tool for the job". We get it, we know you don't like the Zeds, just be happy with your beloved D5 and D850 and move on. Others are supremely happy with their Z6/7 and life goes on.
Dec 29, 2019 at 06:20 PM
Previous versions of Lance B's message #15091998 « Jared - one year in on Z6 / Z7 »
