Don't quite get how the camera - no matter if film or digital - itself should make a difference for long exposure or not.
"it" being the camera body.
For film, "it" has no bearing.
For digital, "it" has significant bearing.
If that isn't readily obvious (to the point I kinda feel silly even pointing it out), then I suspect you'll not be able to understand the point(s) that have been trying to be made regarding the LENR process inherently applied in some cameras.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't see in any of your earlier threads here that you brought up LENR related to Leica (I only see it when you mentioned some Kodak SLR). Do you have personal experience with any Leica rangefinder camera?
I believe others have already been speaking to that. I brought up my experience the the SLR/C to offer up the fact that LENR can be an inconvenient issue for some ... whether it is in a Leica body or otherwise. I believe that was the point that was trying to be made, that some seemed to be having trouble with grasping / following / understanding that it could be a real point of concern for some folks. Just another data point regarding LENR.
Ok, thanks, got it now. Yes, LENR can be different when comparing newer MLC and rangefinder cameras. I have this function in my MLC and always turn it off. I tried it a few times, and it only slowed down the process when taking long exposures with not much benefit in the end. This might have changed in newer models - it is something I can't tell from my personal experience. I only know that I don't need this kind of function for my personal style in photography - I wouldn't pay much attention to this option when considering to buy a new digital camera. For others who do lots of astro/night shooting, it might be a different story (not my area).
Nov 24, 2019 at 04:05 PM
Previous versions of retrofocus's message #15055218 « Mirrorless to Rangefinder transition »
