lighthound wrote:
The buffer does not block you from firing off another burst after letting off the shutter but it seems to limit the amount of frames to however many have cleared. For instance, I let off the shutter after hitting the buffer then fired it again after about 1 second and got about a 3 frame burst. I then waited about 2 seconds and got another 6 or so frames.
Good to know.
I love that machine gun sound.
Reminds me of the sound my 1D2 N used to make at 8 FPS. If it has that similar cadence ... yup, it can be rather visceral. It gives you that feeling of "Now, that's a camera."
Since I haven't shot it yet, I can't compare it directly, but your statement sure is reminiscent of when I got my first 1D2.
I don't know how only 4 fps over my 6DII @ 6 fps can be so drastically different
6 fps = .166 sec
10 fps = .1 sec
So while it is "only" 4, it takes 66% more time between shots on the slower 6D2. Which, essentially means for every 2 shots you got with the 6D2, you now get 3 1/3.
Took a stab at your sooc (usm & nr only, global applied) to see how it played a bit (this was using CS6, i.e. old laptop). Will be a learning curve to find out what the files can tolerate and how to best harness them through what settings / approach to get that sweet spot between noise & detail. First crack (from the posted small jpg) is encouraging.
From your exif, that calc's to about EV 10 lighting.
Next up ... 500/4 at dawn with a K-Mart, blue light special.
NOTE: Since the Bayer array is RGGB or RGBG, there is only 1 B, so the same ISO 6400 in deeper blue light may be a bit noisier than presented here. Will be interesting to find out how it plays for ya. But, if f/8 is netting this, I'm sure you're looking forward to f/4, all the more.
lighthound wrote:
The buffer does not block you from firing off another burst after letting off the shutter but it seems to limit the amount of frames to however many have cleared. For instance, I let off the shutter after hitting the buffer then fired it again after about 1 second and got about a 3 frame burst. I then waited about 2 seconds and got another 6 or so frames.
Good to know.
I love that machine gun sound.
Reminds me of the sound my 1D2 N used to make at 8 FPS. If it has that similar cadence ... yup, it can be rather visceral. It gives you that feeling of "Now, that's a camera."
Since I haven't shot it yet, I can't compare it directly, but your statement sure is reminiscent of when I got my first 1D2.
I don't know how only 4 fps over my 6DII @ 6 fps can be so drastically different
6 fps = .166 sec
10 fps = .1 sec
So while it is "only" 4, it takes 66% more time between shots on the slower 6D2. Which, essentially means for every 2 shots you got with the 6D2, you now get 3 1/3.
Took a stab at your sooc (usm & nr only, global applied) to see how it played a bit (this was using CS6, i.e. old laptop). Will be a learning curve to find out what the files can tolerate and how to best harness them through what settings / approach to get that sweet spot between noise & detail. First crack (from the posted small jpg) is encouraging.
From your exif, that calc's to about EV 10 lighting.
Next up ... 500/4 at dawn with a K-Mart, blue light special.
NOTE: Since the Bayer array is RGGB or RGBG, there is only 1 B, so the same ISO 6400 in deeper blue light may be a bit noisier than presented here. Will be interesting to find out how it plays for ya. But, if f/8 is netting this, I'm sure you're looking forward to f/4.
lighthound wrote:
The buffer does not block you from firing off another burst after letting off the shutter but it seems to limit the amount of frames to however many have cleared. For instance, I let off the shutter after hitting the buffer then fired it again after about 1 second and got about a 3 frame burst. I then waited about 2 seconds and got another 6 or so frames.
Good to know.
I love that machine gun sound.
Reminds me of the sound my 1D2 N used to make at 8 FPS. If it has that similar cadence ... yup, it can be rather visceral. It gives you that feeling of "Now, that's a camera."
Since I haven't shot it yet, I can't compare it directly, but your statement sure is reminiscent of when I got my first 1D2.
I don't know how only 4 fps over my 6DII @ 6 fps can be so drastically different
6 fps = .166 sec
10 fps = .1 sec
So while it is "only" 4, it takes 66% more time between shots on the slower 6D2. Which, essentially means for every 2 shots you got with the 6D2, you now get 3 1/3.
Took a stab at your sooc (usm & nr only, global applied) to see how it played a bit (this was using CS6, i.e. old laptop). Will be a learning curve to find out what the files can tolerate and how to best harness them through what settings / approach to get that sweet spot between noise & detail. First crack (from the posted small jpg) is encouraging.
From your exif, that calc's to about EV 10 lighting.
Next up ... 500/4 at dawn with a K-Mart, blue light special.
NOTE: Since the Bayer array is RGGB or RGBG, there is only 1 B, so the same ISO 6400 in deeper blue light may be noisier than presented here.
lighthound wrote:
The buffer does not block you from firing off another burst after letting off the shutter but it seems to limit the amount of frames to however many have cleared. For instance, I let off the shutter after hitting the buffer then fired it again after about 1 second and got about a 3 frame burst. I then waited about 2 seconds and got another 6 or so frames.
Good to know.
I love that machine gun sound.
Reminds me of the sound my 1D2 N used to make at 8 FPS. If it has that similar cadence ... yup, it can be rather visceral. It gives you that feeling of "Now, that's a camera."
Since I haven't shot it yet, I can't compare it directly, but your statement sure is reminiscent of when I got my first 1D2.
I don't know how only 4 fps over my 6DII @ 6 fps can be so drastically different
6 fps = .166 sec
10 fps = .1 sec
So while it is "only" 4, it takes 66% more time between shots on the slower 6D2. Which, essentially means for every 2 shots you got with the 6D2, you now get 3 1/3.
Took a stab at your sooc (usm & nr only, global applied) to see how it played a bit (this was using CS6, i.e. old laptop). Will be a learning curve to find out what the files can tolerate and how to best harness them through what settings / approach to get that sweet spot between noise & detail. First crack (from the posted small jpg) is encouraging.
From your exif, that calc's to about EV 10 lighting.
Next up ... 500/4 at dawn with a K-Mart, blue light special.
NOTE: Since the Bayer array is RGGB or RGBG, there is only 1 B, so the same ISO 6400 may be noisier in the blue vs. closer to full spectrum.
lighthound wrote:
The buffer does not block you from firing off another burst after letting off the shutter but it seems to limit the amount of frames to however many have cleared. For instance, I let off the shutter after hitting the buffer then fired it again after about 1 second and got about a 3 frame burst. I then waited about 2 seconds and got another 6 or so frames.
Good to know.
I love that machine gun sound.
Reminds me of the sound my 1D2 N used to make at 8 FPS. If it has that similar cadence ... yup, it can be rather visceral. It gives you that feeling of "Now, that's a camera."
Since I haven't shot it yet, I can't compare it directly, but your statement sure is reminiscent of when I got my first 1D2.
I don't know how only 4 fps over my 6DII @ 6 fps can be so drastically different
6 fps = .166 sec
10 fps = .1 sec
So while it is "only" 4, it takes 66% more time between shots on the slower 6D2. Which, essentially means for every 2 shots you got with the 6D2, you now get 3 1/3.
Took a stab at your sooc (usm & nr only, global applied) to see how it played a bit (this was using CS6, i.e. old laptop). Will be a learning curve to find out what the files can tolerate and how to best harness them through what settings / approach to get that sweet spot between noise & detail. First crack (from the posted small jpg) is encouraging.
From your exif, that calc's to about EV 10 lighting.
Next up ... 500/4 at dawn with a K-Mart, blue light special.
lighthound wrote:
The buffer does not block you from firing off another burst after letting off the shutter but it seems to limit the amount of frames to however many have cleared. For instance, I let off the shutter after hitting the buffer then fired it again after about 1 second and got about a 3 frame burst. I then waited about 2 seconds and got another 6 or so frames.
Good to know.
I love that machine gun sound.
Reminds me of the sound my 1D2 N used to make at 8 FPS. If it has that similar cadence ... yup, it can be rather visceral. It gives you that feeling of "Now, that's a camera."
Since I haven't shot it yet, I can't compare it directly, but your statement sure is reminiscent of when I got my first 1D2.
I don't know how only 4 fps over my 6DII @ 6 fps can be so drastically different
6 fps = .166 sec
10 fps = .1 sec
So while it is "only" 4, it takes 66% more time between shots on the slower 6D2. Which, essentially means for every 2 shots you got with the 6D2, you now get 3 1/3.
Took a stab at your sooc (usm & nr only, global applied) to see how it played a bit (this was using CS6, i.e. old laptop). Will be a learning curve to find out what the files can tolerate and how to best harness them through what settings / approach to get that sweet spot between noise & detail. First crack (from the posted small jpg) is encouraging.
From your exif, that calc's to about EV 10 lighting.
lighthound wrote:
The buffer does not block you from firing off another burst after letting off the shutter but it seems to limit the amount of frames to however many have cleared. For instance, I let off the shutter after hitting the buffer then fired it again after about 1 second and got about a 3 frame burst. I then waited about 2 seconds and got another 6 or so frames.
Good to know.
I love that machine gun sound.
Reminds me of the sound my 1D2 N used to make at 8 FPS. If it has that similar cadence ... yup, it can be rather visceral. It gives you that feeling of "Now, that's a camera."
Since I haven't shot it yet, I can't compare it directly, but your statement sure is reminiscent of when I got my first 1D2.
I don't know how only 4 fps over my 6DII @ 6 fps can be so drastically different
6 fps = .166 sec
10 fps = .1 sec
So while it is "only" 4, it takes 66% more time between shots on the slower 6D2. Which, essentially means for every 2 shots you got with the 6D2, you now get 3 1/3.
Took a stab at your sooc (usm & nr only, global applied) to see how it played a bit (this was using CS6, i.e. old laptop). Will be a learning curve to find out what the files can tolerate and how to best harness them through what settings / approach to get that sweet spot between noise & detail. First crack (from the posted small jpg) is encouraging.
From your exif, that calc's to about EV 10 lighting.
lighthound wrote:
For instance, I let off the shutter after hitting the buffer then fired it again after about 1 second and got about a 3 frame burst. I then waited about 2 seconds and got another 6 or so frames.
Good to know.
I love that machine gun sound.
Reminds me of the sound my 1D2 N used to make at 8 FPS. If it has that similar cadence ... yup, it can be rather visceral. It gives you that feeling of "Now, that's a camera."
Since I haven't shot it yet, I can't compare it directly, but your statement sure is reminiscent of when I got my first 1D2.
I don't know how only 4 fps over my 6DII @ 6 fps can be so drastically different
6 fps = .166 sec
10 fps = .1 sec
So while it is "only" 4, it takes 66% more time between shots on the slower 6D2. Which, essentially means for every 2 shots you got with the 6D2, you now get 3 1/3.
Took a stab at your sooc (usm & nr only, global applied) to see how it played a bit (this was using CS6, i.e. old laptop). Will be a learning curve to find out what the files can tolerate and how to best harness them through what settings / approach to get that sweet spot between noise & detail. First crack (from the posted small jpg) is encouraging.
From your exif, that calc's to about EV 10 lighting.
lighthound wrote:
For instance, I let off the shutter after hitting the buffer then fired it again after about 1 second and got about a 3 frame burst. I then waited about 2 seconds and got another 6 or so frames.
Good to know.
I love that machine gun sound.
Reminds me of the sound my 1D2 N used to make at 8 FPS. If it has that similar cadence ... yup, it can be rather visceral. It gives you that feeling of "Now, that's a camera."
Since I haven't shot it yet, I can't compare it directly, but your statement sure is reminiscent of when I got my first 1D2.
I don't know how only 4 fps over my 6DII @ 6 fps can be so drastically different
6 fps = .166 sec
10 fps = .1 sec
So while it is "only" 4, it takes 66% more time between shots on the slower 6D2. Which, essentially means for every 2 shots you got with the 6D2, you now get 3 1/3.
Took a stab at your sooc (usm & nr only, global applied) to see how it played a bit (this was using CS6, i.e. old laptop). Will be a learning curve to find out what the files can tolerate and how to best harness them through what settings / approach to get that sweet spot between noise & detail. First crack (from the posted small jpg) is encouraging.
From your exif, that calc's to about EV 10 lighting.
lighthound wrote:
For instance, I let off the shutter after hitting the buffer then fired it again after about 1 second and got about a 3 frame burst. I then waited about 2 seconds and got another 6 or so frames.
Good to know.
I love that machine gun sound.
Reminds me of the sound my 1D2 N used to make at 8 FPS. If it has that similar cadence ... yup, it can be rather visceral. It gives you that feeling of "Now, that's a camera."
Since I haven't shot it yet, I can't compare it directly, but your statement sure is reminiscent of when I got my first 1D2.
I don't know how only 4 fps over my 6DII @ 6 fps can be so drastically different
6 fps = .166 sec
10 fps = .1 sec
So while it is "only" 4, it takes 66% more time between shots on the slower 6D2. Which, essentially means for every 2 shots you got with the 6D2, you now get 3 1/3.
Took a stab at your sooc (usm & nr only, global applied) to see how it played a bit (this was using CS6, i.e. old laptop). Will be a learning curve to find out what the files can tolerate and how to best harness them through what settings / approach to get that sweet spot between noise & detail. First crack (from the posted small jpg) is encouraging.
From your exif, that calc's to about EV 10 lighting.
