Krich wrote:
Great approach (small, light, AF, with asph and ED elements, very reasonably priced), and probably great optically -- but a little too late.
Tamron 17-28 /2.8 makes this thing redundant.
I agree. Assuming someone doesn't already own a wide. I guess for the money this would be nice. But I'm with you. I'll take the Tamron 17-28 and versatility over a couple small 2.8 primes. I had the Batis18mm and sold it and have not missed it one bit. The 67mm on the Tamron is nice because I still have the 24GM which is 67 as well. One could add the 40 batis and 85 and 135 and only need a 67mm filter. To bad I hate the Batis design
Sep 30, 2019 at 06:55 PM
Previous versions of nhsonyshooter's message #14997393 « Samyang AF 18/2.8 FE officially announced »
