I bought the Sigma so I could have a fast 135mm for low light action right away. I thought I might swap it out when the Sony came. But the Sigma has been working just fine for many months now. I shoot the 25mP A9 so I don’t imagine the extra little bit of Sony IQ would show. The difference now is $690 more for the Sony. I have more important things to spend $700 on.
Aug 28, 2019 at 12:18 AM
Previous versions of SoundHound's message #14960039 « Sigma Art 135 vs Sony 135GM »
