Re: Wimberly vs Really Right Stuff replacement lens foot for 200-600?
naturephoto1 wrote:
For my 100-400mm GM I have and like the Kirk replacement foot very. It is a little higher from the lens boady than (more reach than the Wimberley but not nearly as long as RRS). Others also have and like the Kirk replacement foot because of the fact that like the RRS it is a direct replacement with the same sort of connection. At the same time it allows the lens to be carried by the replacement foot as a handle much more easily than the Wimberley and yet it is much closer to the lens body than the RRS. When I get the 200-600mm G lens in the future and Kirk has the replacement foot available, that is what I anticipate to use as a replacement.
Rich
Hi Rich, I contacted Kirk two days ago. They said they couldn't start making the foot until they get their hand on a 200-600 lens. I am guessing another it will be 4 or 5 more weeks before we see the Kirk foot.
Aug 14, 2019 at 09:20 PM
Previous versions of Douglas L's message #14945871 « Wimberly vs Really Right Stuff replacement lens foot for 200-600? »
